1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Studentka2010 [4]
3 years ago
11

PLEASE HELP

History
2 answers:
Varvara68 [4.7K]3 years ago
7 0
Lincoln believed they committed acts of treason.
Zigmanuir [339]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

A.

Explanation:

The secessionists claimed that according to the Constitution every state had the right to leave the Union. Lincoln claimed that they did not have that right. He opposed secession for these reasons:

1. Physically the states cannot separate.

2. Secession is unlawful.

3. A government that allows secession will disintegrate into anarchy.

4. That Americans are not enemies, but friends.

5. Secession would destroy the world's only existing democracy, and prove for all time, to future Americans and to the world, that a government of the people cannot survive.

You might be interested in
1. Which of the following was NOT a consequence of advances in metallurgy during the Bronze and Iron Ages? decline in human popu
Marrrta [24]

Answer:

It’s A

Explanation: decline in human population

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Ano ang cohesive device?​
AveGali [126]
Ang Cohesive devices o, Kohesyong gramatikal ay mga salitang panghalili sa pangngalan sa isang pangungusap. Mayroong dalawang uri ng Kohesyong Gramatikal, ito ay ang mga sumusunod:

Anapora - panghalili sa pangngalan na matatagpuan sa hulihan ng pangungusap.

Katapora - panghalili sa pangngalan na matatagpuan sa unahan ng pangungusap.
_
Tatlong halimbawa ng Cohesive devices:

1) Ito
2) Dito
3) Siya
5 0
3 years ago
In the US some people believe controls necessary while others believe gun rights should not be restricted what is the effect of
tigry1 [53]

Answer:

I mean debate can encourage new laws but if you have one side wishing for laws and the other against it. It will usually slow legislation which is entirely the purpose. But it depends on what view are you taking it from because th end result can be no legislation at all or even a relaxation of legislation in fact that's happened in some states. So it depends on the view and narrative you wish to push. because it can be a semblance of all but B. If you're a centrist you'd probably say this debate will encourage new laws but the whole point of not wishing for infringements upon one's rights means no new laws. If you wanted new laws then this debate is a waste of time but you're angering a large portion of the population because you seek not to listen to the statistics and thereby information one may have that may dissuade from the legislation. And if you look at D it can be so. If 2 cannot agree then rights will not be infringed upon. Unless the side with more representatives that disagrees with the right then such laws will be enacted. Yes, they can place new restrictions and there you can make the case it's unconstitutional and etc because well there is ground and a foundation laid upon there. But as far as an actual thing it'd be A I suppose. But I'd question the teacher because it depends on how one views a division. It can be either cooperative relationships that can be mended or an all or nothing if it's not my way then we will have conflict and it shall erupt. It all depends.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Bakit sumali ang united states sa digmaan?
stealth61 [152]
<span>In 1917, Germany, determined to win its war of attrition against the Allies, announced the resumption of unrestricted warfare in war-zone waters. Three days later, the United States broke diplomatic relations with Germany, and just hours after that the American liner Housatonic was sunk by a German U-boat.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Contrast your choice against one of the other options, comparing the similarities and differences between experiences of
N76 [4]

Answer:

Both are powerless and work of the house.

Explanation:

The similarities and differences between experiences of  individuals from the two groups are the women and slaves. The similarities between women and slaves is that both were powerless in the society. Both women and slaves work at the house while on the other hand, the main difference between women and slaves is that women has also many rights in the society and respect but the slaves have none.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the earliest documented evidence of early life in Oklahoma?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of these NOT pictured in Source 2 addresses a common imperial technique implemented by the Chinese comparable to the techn
    9·2 answers
  • 4)
    8·1 answer
  • As part of its policy of containment during the cold war, the government imposed what act?
    15·1 answer
  • Describe how Father de Mora used slaves to mine the gold.
    12·2 answers
  • Vladimir Lenin and the Bolshevik party had the support of all the following people EXCEPT the:
    8·2 answers
  • Please help me I'm stuck
    15·2 answers
  • How do proxy war differs from a traditional war?
    8·1 answer
  • Five basic elements you should identify for any source of historical evidence
    13·1 answer
  • What’s the correct answer ?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!