Answer: i think it’s b - the clear and present danger test
Explanation: because the clear and present danger test originated in Schenck v. the United States. The test says that the printed or spoken word may not be the subject of previous restraint or subsequent punishment unless its expression creates a clear and present danger of bringing about a substantial evil.
Answer:
Well it depends on the situation lets say that the President needs to persuade someone to join forces or to accept peace. But they can also persude some one to do the wrong thing. Presidents very seldom act entirely on their own; unless they can persuade others to support them and follow through, presidents who act unilaterally can be frustrated and even humiliated. As this is written, most of the executive orders President Obama issued in his second term are about to be nullified by the courts, President Trump, or Congress. These orders were effective for a while because President Obama was able to get his own cabinet officers to implement them; but they were toast as soon as others acted against them. In reality the President does have the power to persuade to make treatys, Veto bills, and take a variety of other measures, such as convening or dismissing Congress and receiving foreign ambassadors. So, In my perspective I belive that it is truly important that a President persuades but only when necessary.
Explanation:
The correct answer is Genetic Engineering
Hope this helps
Answer:
Total war and political instability in the first half of the 20th century gave way to a polarized state order during the Cold War and eventually to efforts at transnational union.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
If you stay alert, you will know if something strange is happening around you. People are more likely to attack single people at night than groups of people during the daytime.