1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yuradex [85]
2 years ago
9

Hello! ^v^ ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

Law
2 answers:
Nezavi [6.7K]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Is it really you, if so you know me.

Explanation:

*Questioning life choices*

kifflom [539]2 years ago
3 0
Hiiii , how are you lol ☺︎︎
You might be interested in
- The American Medical Association classifies alcohol as:
stellarik [79]

Answer:a disenfectant?

Explanation:alcohol disenfects wounds

7 0
3 years ago
There are many modes of constitutional interpretation. In 500 words discuss two forms (i.e., aspirationalism, strict constructio
Vera_Pavlovna [14]

Answer:

There are three basic modes of constitutional interpretation: strict construction, aspirationalism, and textualism. The strict construction approach seeks to apply the Constitution according to what it says explicitly rather than based on desirable social consequences; the aspirational approach applies the Constitution based on societal standards regardless of whether it contradicts what it says, and the textualist approach looks only at the text of laws regardless of their effect on society.

The literal interpretation assumes that the US Constitution was set in stone by an all-knowing entity. If this is true, then what use are the amendments if one had already decided the outcome of every single dispute ever framed under them? The idea of being open to interpretation is so that new issues can be solved using old principles. Yes, some people may choose to "go rogue" with these principles come up, but I side with keeping my own freedoms limited for greater freedoms for others. And finally, aspirationalism takes into account that America's founding fathers wanted aspirations, not just laws. They would have understood that sometimes even they couldn't agree on moral solutions, and they knew times change over time.

I prefer strict aspirational because it takes into account social progress. The Constitution is meant to be a living document that isn't static, and the Constitution was written in a time when slavery, women's suffrage and segregation were still acceptable. The Constitution needs to evolve with society and make sense in modern times - interpretations.

The Constitution was written at a time when slavery was legal in America - aspirationalism would have been impossible back then. The Constitution works on interpretation - if it didn't, we wouldn't need it. Over time, we've developed aspirationalism to be able to interpret the Constitution more fairly. It's not what the Constitution says, it's how well society can agree to interpret that.

Explanation:

The modes of constitutional interpretation are two of the most popular ways in which constitutional law is interpreted. An aspirationalist judge would favor arguments that all legislation should follow the “original intent” of the constitution while strict constructionists follows the literal text of the constitution.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Deducciones autorizadas por la ley
Vadim26 [7]
Esas tienes que buscarlas en línea para estar más segura obvisss
4 0
2 years ago
What is true about conflicts of interest?
Luda [366]

Answer:

A conflict of interest can come in a situation where an individual has competing interests or loyalties because of their duties to more than one person or organization. A person with a conflict of interest can't do justice to the actual or potentially conflicting interests of both parties. For instance, if internal auditor, who is in a position of trust, has a competing professional or personal interest.

Another example is if a person have a loyalty to an employer and also loyalty to a family business. Each of these businesses expects the person to have its best interest first. Thus, the conflict .

Such competing interests can make it difficult to fulfill his or her duties impartially.

A conflict of interest exists even if no unethical or improper act results.

6 0
3 years ago
What are the roles of the Judicial component in the criminal justice system
natali 33 [55]

Answer:

To issue a judgement after looking at all the evidences in a calm and rational manner, and then renders an unbiased opinion.

Explanation:

The criminal justice system is a series of government agencies and institutions. Goals include the rehabilitation of offenders, preventing other crimes, and moral support for victims. The primary institutions of the criminal justice system are the police, prosecution and defense lawyers, the courts and prisons.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • In 2008, Congress passed the Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act. What was the scope of the changes?
    6·1 answer
  • During training as Special Agents, trainees _____.
    9·1 answer
  • Appellate court judges ask these during oral<br> argument
    14·1 answer
  • Can animal wildlife protection be an amendment, or do amendment have to affect humans?
    11·1 answer
  • Before the era of modern communications, when a town watchman or constable needed assistance, he would raise a___
    13·2 answers
  • Feels like we're on the edge right now
    12·2 answers
  • A child was abducted from a local restaurant. Police closed the restaurant while they
    12·1 answer
  • A suspect is taking a polygraph and is asked a specific question about the victim. The suspect's heart rate increases and their
    5·1 answer
  • 8 liters is the same as how many gallons? round anwer to the nearst tenth
    7·2 answers
  • In preparation for a meeting with an investor, Roger prepares information on three properties. How does he determine the effecti
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!