Answer:
La ley de refracción
Explanation:
La ley de refracción, o la ley de Snell, predice el ángulo en el que un rayo de luz se doblará o refractará, a medida que pase de un medio a otro.
Judicial restraint is the political theory that says courts shouldn't, unless absolutely required, issue rulings that broaden or alter the character of existing laws.
<h3>Justiciable constraint is exercised by whom?</h3>
A jurist (judge or justice) who upholds a philosophy of restraint can be described as one who considers democracy to have intrinsic, rather than just instrumental, value, that the judiciary is indeed the least powerful of the three branches of government, and who values stability and predictability in the lawmaking process.
<h3>Why do advocates of judicial restraint assert that judges are impervious to public sentiment?</h3>
They are freed from the strain of the outer world of public opinion since they do not have to worry about being reelected. In the end, the majority may not always be correct. The fact that the Founders established appointed judges and elected legislators is not by coincidence.
Learn more about Judicial restraint: brainly.com/question/29545866
#SPJ4
The strengths of dispute resolution strategies are that dispute resolution rarely results in arrests and is less expensive than adjudication, and focuses on resolving miscommunication and misunderstanding issues.
<h3>What is dispute resolution?</h3>
Dispute resolution is a strategy to resolve differences between two or more groups regarding an issue peacefully and through dialogue.
This method is considered the most appropriate for solving problems because it prevents disputes from ending in violent confrontations and one of those involved being injured or killed. On the contrary, this method ensures that all parties involved get their demands or needs.
According to the above, it can be inferred that as a result of dispute resolution costs can be reduced, number of arrests and it is a way to clarify the message that each one wants to express.
Learn more about communication in: brainly.com/question/22558440
#SPJ1
Answer:
The candidate who spends the most money usually wins
Explanation:
Answer:
No, I do not agree. Judges should not be appointed for life. Sometimes the judges might have terible opinions and may be biased.
Explanation:
