1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
atroni [7]
2 years ago
5

PlZ ANSWER ASAP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST

History
1 answer:
cluponka [151]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

What did immigrants experience?

Often stereotyped and discriminated against, many immigrants suffered verbal and physical abuse because they were "different." While large-scale immigration created many social tensions, it also produced a new vitality in the cities and states in which the immigrants settled.

You might be interested in
1. What was the most valuable resource in America? *
Yakvenalex [24]

Answer:

gold

Explanation:

the gold is rare  to find

4 0
3 years ago
England's three-pronged attack to defeat the Patriots was to end in which city?
Elina [12.6K]

Answer:

D.) Boston

Boston was a very rebellious city, so Britain set up a system that basically punished just Boston.

6 0
4 years ago
Which cultural advancement is the Olmec civilization known for?
givi [52]

Answer:

i think it would be a system of writing.

Explanation:

there writing system was a major break through for modern times.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If u help me with these 15 questions ill give brainlest every time have to be right
Scilla [17]

Answer:

The head of government in the Inca Empire was the Sapa Inca. The Sapa Inca was a god. He was not a king. To the Inca people, he was an actual god. He was sacred. The Inca believed he was descended from the most important of the many Inca gods - the sun god Inti. The Sapa Inca represented Inti on earth. Government and religion were totally intertwined in the Inca Empire because the head of government was a god.

The Spanish gave him the name "Sapa".  They perceived him as the emperor or the king, because that was their background; that's what they were familiar with for the person in charge of government. The Sapa Inca was called Apu by the Inca people, which means divinity. We're going to call him the Sapa Inca because the Spanish name stuck and that's what he is referred to today, except of course by scholars. But it's an important distinction. It's the reason that people, no matter how cruelly they were treated, did not revolt. The Inca people believed if they tried to overthrow the Sapa Inca, they might anger the sun god Inti and be punished by losing the sun. You can imagine how powerful that made the Sapa Inca.

How did the Sapa Inca rule 12 million people all by himself? That's easy. He didn't. The Sapa Inca organized his government in a pyramid. He put his relatives in positions of power.  

The Sapa Inca - alone at the top of the pyramid

Supreme Council (4 men) –The Inca Empire was divided into Four Quarters. Each member of the Supreme Council controlled one Quarter. All reported to the Sapa Inca.

Working Management:

Provincial Governors – Each of the Four Quarters was divided into regions. A Provincial Governor was assigned to run one region. Except for the Sapa Inca and the 4 members of the Supreme Council, the Provincial Governors were the most powerful political leaders in the Inca Empire.  

Officials (army officers, priests, judges, and others from the noble class)

These individuals could ride in a litter and had other special privileges not enjoyed by the general population.

Tax collectors.  There were several levels of tax collectors. There was one tax collector for every ayllu (for every family group.) That tax collector reported to a collector higher up the scale who might be in charge of several tax collectors, and so on. Their rung on the social scale was measured accordingly.

Workers. At the bottom of the pyramid were the workers. Workers were organized into family units called ayllus. Each ayllus was composed of 10-20 people. Most of the people in the Inca Empire were workers.

When the Inca made a new law, he told the top tax collectors. They told the tax collectors who reported to them, who told the next level down, and so on, until every farmer and every family in the empire heard the news. Since the workers could not vote or voice an opinion, that was the end of it until the Inca Sapa made a new law.

Common people had no freedom. They could not own or run a business. They could not own luxury goods. The only items common people could have in their homes were things they needed to do their job. They could not travel on the roads. Only a small amount of time was allotted for bathing and eating. Life was not all work. They had lots of religious holidays. But they could not be idle. That was the law. Either they were celebrating a state approved holiday, working in the fields, or sleeping.

Service Tax: The Incas loved gold and silver. They had no use for money. The tax collectors did not collect money. They collected man-hours. Every worker had to do his or her job. Plus, every worker had to additionally pay a service tax for the privilege of doing his or her job. Tax was paid in labor - in billions of man-hours. That is how the Incas were able to build so much so rapidly. Each year, every common man in the empire worked off his tax by serving in the army, in the mines, or in construction - building roads, temples, and palaces.

There were many laws that kept a family (an ayllu) in its place. Laws dictated who should work, when, where, and at what time. Local officials had the power to make all decisions about the lives of the people they ruled. Inspectors stopped by frequently to check on things. Breaking a law usually meant the death penalty. Very few people broke the law.

Explanation:

ANSWER

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Think about what you know about the Espionage and Sedition Acts. Now apply that to some real-world situations. Check any action
leva [86]
The following statements would result in the application of the Espionage and Sedition Acts: 

1) A person says that the government made a mistake by getting involved in the war.

2) A speaker suggests that people should stop work to protest the war.

3) A labor union holds a strike at a munitions factory.

Both of these statements would result in punishments according to the Espionage and Sedition Acts (passed in 1918, during World War I). These acts made any speech that was considered critical of the government or disloyal to the US illegal. Along with this, anyone who interfered with the war effort could be punished. This is why the statements above would be real world situations of the Espionage and Sedition Acts.
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How was the economic system of post war canada different from that of postwar poland?
    13·2 answers
  • Can someone help me with the thesis
    6·1 answer
  • Each of the thirteen states had to approve the plan of government before it could take effect. What does this tell you
    15·1 answer
  • What factors lead to the era of good feelings
    11·1 answer
  • What one man was most powerful from 1649 to 1658?
    8·1 answer
  • Pls help me... i cant find the answer
    14·2 answers
  • Where did farming begin in the Americas
    7·2 answers
  • Do you like puzzles.
    13·1 answer
  • Which is the closest approximate location for the city of Baghdad?
    6·2 answers
  • 50 points help me help help
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!