Drawing a conclusion from the graph, the true statement from the option given is <em>Voter turnout in national election years is irregular from 2006 to </em><em>2020</em><em>.</em><em> </em>
Voter turnout in 2006 was 40% while in 2014 it was 35% `; hence, voters were more interested in 2006 than in 2014.
In some of the years given, less than 50% of Americans participated in the polls.
Hence, the true statement is <em>"</em><em>Voter turnout in national election years is irregular from 2006 to </em><em>2020</em><em>"</em><em> </em>
Learn more : brainly.com/question/18405415
The true statement about the causation between the variables it is a weak negative correlation, and it is not likely causal.
<h3>What is causation between the variables?</h3>
The causation between the variables shows that the occurrence of one event causes the occurrence of the other.
The informal relationship between two events.
Thus, the correct option is A, it is a weak negative correlation, and it is not likely causal.
Learn more about variables
brainly.com/question/15740935
#SPJ1
See? i am not sure if it’s right, sorry if it is not!!!
Answer:
throughout the passage, the author leads up to the significant event of the narrator voting at the end. which statement best describes how the author establishes the significance of that event?
Explanation:
