Check the picture below.
keeping in mind that a cube is just a rectangular prism with all equal sides.
The 1st graph has vertex in (-3, -3) which can be translated into
Horizontal shift left 3
Vertical shift down 3
Other than that, the graph shows y=x^2 so it wasn't compressed or stretched
The 2nd graph has vertex in (0, 0) which mean there is no vertical and horizontal shift. But the graph is facing down and it was slimmer than y=x^2 graph. When x=1, the result is y=3 which was 3 times more than it supposed to be.
The graph must be:
Reflection across x-axis
Vertical stretch of 3
The 3rd graph has vertex in (3, -3) which can be translated into
Horizontal shift right 3
Vertical shift down 3
Same as the 1st graph, the 3rd graph shows y=x^2 so it wasn't compressed or stretched.
Answer:
Yes, the total cost of Lacey lesson is a split function of hours scheduled
Step-by-step explanation:
The amount Lacey pays for each hour of golf = $15
The amount Lacey pays for equipment rental = $10
The amount Lacy pays for equipment rental for a 3 hours long lesson = $5
Therefore, we have
Let C represent the total cost of Lacey lesson and let t represent the number of hours, we have;
C = $10 + t × $15 for 0 ≤ t ≤ 3
C = $5 + t × $15 for t > 3
Therefore, the total cost of Lacey lesson is a split function of hours scheduled
