Answer:
Westermarck was telling us that there are no absolute standards in morality and that moral truth is relative. The reason for his approach is that each person has a moral conscience that is unique. One cannot apply a standard theory of philosophical thought to each person, because each person’s morality is predicated upon the way he or she was brought up. Virtue Ethics deals with a person’s character, and the formation of that character has its beginnings at an early age by what that person was taught. Westermarck and Aristotle have similar thought processes involving an individual. Aristotle believed that moral virtue is product of habit learned from an early age. Westermarck thought that moral views were based upon subjective factors. Subjective habits are learned from parents, teachers, and life experiences unique to an individual. A consciousness of morality is derived from those teachings and experiences learned in youth. These moral thoughts were a product of reflection of what had been taught overtime, and which would become rational expressions of individual morality as an adult. Is it not true that the virtue of person is based upon what his or her moral conscience consists of? The psychological effects of these teachings and experiences gleamed in youth cannot be discarded as mere sophomoric intrusions of moral liabilities against the standards of morality, but must be considered an integral component for the search of moral truth. Westermarck’s theory is just as valid as any other moral theory.
Explanation:
Yes, war is never right.
No matter the reason, nobody should ever use it to cause war and take lives, especially lives of those who are innocent, you unfortunately got got in the middle. It hurts, it destroys, it steals at least hundreds of lives and hard earned houses (and food, depending if crops are grown) all for the sake of one or two reasons. It hardly ever solves anything when there are other ways- diplomancy, truce, or persuasion.
Is that okay?
Hope it helped,
Tiara
"Vogue" by Madonna was the number 1 single in the US on that date
Answer:
Brutus decides to join the conspiracy against Caesar because he fears that Caesar will become ruthless once he has absolute power.
Explanation:
This is the best way to describe how the characterization of Caesar in the passage connects to the central idea. In this passage, Brutus reflects on the qualities of Caesar. He tells us that so far, he does not think he has any reason to doubt Caesar's integrity. However, he is unsure about the ways in which this character might change if Caesar is given more power. Despite his qualities, men who have a lot of power often abuse it. Therefore, Brutus concludes that he will join the conspiracy against Caesar because he fears that Caesar will become ruthless once he has absolute power.
