All categories

3 years ago

Can the following question be considered a statistical question and why or why not?

2 answers:

7 0

It could. If you turn it into an experiment. Let's say you take 100 students from each grade, and you ask them if they exercise. And then you wanna create a graph. And find out out of those students how many of them exercise and how many of them do not. Then turn it into a percent.

I hope this helps. If you have any further questions on this or any other questions just ask. I am here to help you, as needed.

MaRussiya [10]3 years ago

5 0

not really because some kids at the school might exercise more than other kids, so it can't be really a statistical question.

hope i helped:)

You might be interested in

Please help me I’ll give you a thanks :-)

Sonbull [250]

Answer:

I love algebra anyways

The ans is in the picture with the steps how i got it

(hope this helps can i plz have brainlist :D hehe)

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Can you please solve ax+z=w-y for a please???

Varvara68 [4.7K]

Answer:

$ax + z = w - y \\ ax = w - y - z \\ a = \frac{w - y - z}{x} \\ thank \: you \:$

3 0

2 years ago

The box plot shows the total amount of time, in minutes, the students of a class spend reading each day

katrin2010 [14]

2. The median for the data is the correct answer

6 0

3 years ago

Please help I’ll mark you as brainliest if correct!

Pavlova-9 [17]

Answer:

3 ways

36÷6=6

36÷2=18

36÷3=12

maybe if not then 2 or 4

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A data mining routine has been applied to a transaction dataset and has classified 88 records as fraudulent (30 correctly so) an

Firlakuza [10]

Answer:

The classification matrix is attached below

Part a

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is 65.91%.

Part b

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is 96.64%

Step-by-step explanation:

The classification matrix is obtained as shown below:

The transaction dataset has 30 fraudulent correctly classified records out of 88 records, that is, 30 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is negative.

Also, there would be 88 - 30 = 58 non-fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 58 records are incorrectly predicted given that an instance is positive.

The transaction dataset has 920 non-fraudulent correctly classified records out of 952 records, that is, 920 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is positive.

Also, there would be 952 - 920 = 32 fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 32 records incorrectly predicted given that an instance is negative.

That is,

Predicted value

Active value Fraudulent Non-fraudulent

Fraudlent 30 58

non-fraudulent 32 920

The classification matrix is obtained by using the information related to the transaction data, which is classified into fraudulent records and non-fraudulent records.

The error rate is obtained as shown below:

The error rate is obtained by taking the ratio of $\left( {b + c} \right)(b+c)$ and the total number of records.

The classification matrix is, shown above

The total number of records is, $30 + 58 + 32 + 920 = 1,040$

The error rate is,

$\begin{array}{c}\\{\rm{Error}}\,{\rm{rate}} = \frac{{b + c}}{{{\rm{Total}}}}\\\\ = \frac{{58 + 32}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = \frac{{90}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = 0.0865\\\end{array}$

The percentage is $0.0865 \times 100 = 8.65$

(a)

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained by taking the rate ratio of b and $\left( {a + b} \right)(a+b)$ .

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained as shown below:

The classification matrix is, shown above and in the attachment

The error rate for truly fraudulent is,

$\begin{array}{c}\\FP = \frac{b}{{a + b}}\\\\ = \frac{{58}}{{30 + 58}}\\\\ = \frac{{58}}{{88}}\\\\ = 0.6591\\\end{array}$

The percentage is, $0.6591 \times 100 = 65.91$

(b)

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is obtained by taking the ratio of d and $\left( {c + d} \right)(c+d)$ .

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is obtained as shown below:

The classification matrix is, shown in the attachment

The error rate for truly non-fraudulent is,

$\begin{array}{c}\\TP = \frac{d}{{c + d}}\\\\ = \frac{{920}}{{32 + 920}}\\\\ = \frac{{920}}{{952}}\\\\ = 0.9664\\\end{array}$

The percentage is, $0.9664 \times 100 = 96.64$

6 0

3 years ago