The Mongol leader from least important to most important are Togon Temur, Kublai, Mongke, Batu, Toregene, Ogodei and Genghis Khan.
- Togon-temür became emperor of the Yuan at the age of 13. He proved to be a weak ruler. In 1368, because the foremost Chinese rebel leader, Zhu Yuanzhang advanced on the capital, Togon-temür fled into the steppes of state. He died there two years later.
- After Möngke’s death, his brother Kublai became great khan. Today Kublai is remembered because the first emperor of the dynasty. Kublai moved the Mongol capital to what's now Beijing, China. None of the later Yuan emperors reached the stature of Kublai, who died in 1294.
- Genghis Khan’s grandson Möngke changed into elected high-quality khan in 1251. He endured to make bigger his grandfather’s empire, attacking present-day Iran, Syria, China, and Vietnam. Under his rule the capital city, Karakorum, have become even richer and extra splendid. He died in 1259
- Batu changed into a grandson of Genghis Khan. In 1235 he changed into elected commander in leader of the western a part of the Mongol Empire, called the Golden Horde, and given obligation for the invasion of Europe. Only the loss of life of Ögödei avoided him from invading western Europe.
- Mongolian warrior-ruler Genghis Khan consolidated nomadic tribes right into a unified Mongolia. His troops created the premise for one of the best continental empires of all time. In fewer than 10 years he took over maximum of northern China. He died on a navy marketing campaign in 1227, and the empire become divided amongst his sons and grandsons.
Thus the least important leader is Togon-temür and the most important is Genghis Khan.
To learn more about mongols, refer: brainly.com/question/17835217
#SPJ10
They feared that they would get no rights and that the Revolutionary would be in vain. They thought the government would take full power over them and become just like King George.
Hope this helps! :D
<em> A.) Improving Roman infrastructures.</em>
<em>When they were moving to another location Roman soldiers did not have to improve on other Roman infrastructures they came upon along the way, because the building of the infrastructures was not organized by the Roman troops, more so they were organized by an architect and the architect's workers.</em>
<em>The reason I also chose A was because the Roman troops traveled in their groups and whenever they were injured it was up to them to man the camp hospitals to heal the wounded. Also recruiting more soldiers along the way was also very helpful to the Roman legion and allowed a much broader amount of soldiers that could be used for taking over land. Not to mention that soldiers (traveling strictly inside their troops) were responsible for feeding themselves (what I'm saying is that the troops were responsible for cooking and feeding each other I just used "themselves" as the word to describe it).</em>
<em>Since Roman soldiers traveled in groups they did not (I'm assuming here I don't know for sure) take women or other people along with them and they only took the amount of soldiers that were assigned by their higher ups. In other words Roman soldiers were really only expected to do as they were ordered to (in modern times any disobedience to what they were ordered to do would have resulted in them having it put on a disaplinary record, but they did not do that sort of thing during Roman times meaning that they punished the soldiers in ways that I don't factually now about). Basically the key importance in the Roman soldier was to carry out the order he received and complete the order quickly and efficiently. However, they did recruit soldiers along the way as they were instructed and that was to help them benefit for taking over land. The commanding officer was the one who told the Roman soldiers what to do when they were traveling (simple tasks, not the task assigned by the current ruler) and the soldiers were expected to complete it. A few of the tasks assigned by the commanding officer could have been to cook, preform healing measures, and recruit more soldiers.</em>
<em>Hope this helps.</em>
<em>-Northstar</em>
Answer:
cultural, religious, and travel.
Explanation:
Fascist intolerance towards minorities often culminates in cultural, religious, and travel. Also widely known as deadly governmental "purging".
Answer:
(b) Is the variable quantitative or qualitative? both quantitative and qualitative qualitative quantitative neither quantitative nor qualitative
Explanation:
