Answer:
the second one "both were part of a larger effort..."
In the case of Mexican History, it was Lazaro Cárdenas.
The answer to this question is the "Writ of Habeas Corpus". Such as under the doctrine of Writ of Habeas Corpus, the judges normally feel the need to follow the rulings established by prior the court decisions. Justiciable controversy habeas corpus precedents stare decisis previous next. The writ of habeas corpus is a written command where become the basis of the offices during jurisdiction.
Answer:
A people who stage a revolt against the authority.
Explanation:
I searched google and took the edge test :3
hope this helps have a wonderful day(or night)
<span>Okay, as I read the history, the Stamp Act and the Townshend Acts were both intended to tax the colonies to help Britain pay off it's debts from the War. The Declaration did not impose any new taxes, but justified making the colonies more dependent on the Crown/British government, so I interpret that as "justification" for the taxes. It's not a word that was used at the time, but our interpretation of it in our own time.(The answer is D) Your welcome!</span>
