I would say the first one
Answer:
Oxygen
Explanation:
The formula for cellular respiration is oxygen + glucose -> water, carbon dioxide, energy. You can already cross out A and D because they aren't in the formula, so you have two left, water and oxygen. The reason why it is oxygen and not water is because without oxygen you can't even have water. also, I just got this right on my test :-)
<h2>
Answer:</h2>
The reasoning used is <u>inductive reasoning</u>.
<h2>
Explanation:</h2>
The type of reasoning where the examples are used to derive conclusion it is called as inductive reasoning. The end is the theory or plausible. This implies the end is the piece of thinking that inductive thinking is attempting to demonstrate. Inductive thinking is likewise alluded to as 'circumstances and logical results thinking' or 'base up thinking' since it looks to demonstrate an end first. This is normally gotten from explicit occasions to build up a general end.
As the given examples quotes many examples of desert and then derives conclusion out of it, this is considered as example of inductive reasoning.
the insertion on removal of mutations are dangerous in nature. the process is basically just one large gamble to see what it does. and even though we have a decent understanding of the genomes of many animals and plants, we still dont know everything. so if we tamper with certain genes we may cause a evolution or we might kill the subject and the potential for it to procreate.
Here you go C <span>storm surge</span>
