Search is the information processing approach describes problem-solving as a process involving.
<h3>What is
information processing?</h3>
Information is acquired, recorded, arranged, retrieved, distributed, displayed, and processed. Recent usage of the phrase has been particularly prevalent when referring to computer-based processes.
Identification of the stimulus, selection of the response, and programming of the response are the three separate stages of information processing.
Through selective attention and information processing, performers are better able to recognize pertinent cues, which increases movement reactions and, eventually, results in good performance.
Thus, it is a search.
For more details about information processing, click here:
brainly.com/question/28198290
#SPJ4
In this example, john's whistling is serving as a discriminative stimulus.
This procedure, studied by Ivan Pavlov, shows a stimulus ( in this case the action of John's whistling) and a response ( the cattle run to the food trough).
Pavlov studied it with dogs. He realised that when a trainer fed them, dogs salivated. So, he presented the dogs with a "stimulus" ( the sound of a metronome) and when he gave the dogs food. After a few repetitions, when the dog listened to the stimulus, it salivated.
I believe the correct answer is low self-control.
A growing body of research has found that low
self-control can be a strong predictor of delinquency and criminal behavior in
children. The theory about the lack of individual self-control as the main factor
behind criminal behavior is called “The self-control theory of crime”.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Marbury v. Madison was a court case that resided with William Marbury being appointed by John Adams, but during the process of his commission, Thomas Jefferson became president, and he and Secretary of State James Madison, added new courts and new judges. William Marbury's commission was not delivered to him, therefore petitioning to the Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus compelling the delivery of his commission.
The Court found Madison's refusal to deliver commissions was illegal but did not grant Marbury a writ of mandamus. Instead, the court held that Marbury did not have the right, under the Judiciary Act of 1789, to claim to the Supreme Court that Madison's act was unconstitutional.
The court knew that a writ of mandamus would be the proper way to fix the situation, but concluded that the court couldn't issue it. Therefore making it clear that Congress did not have the power to modify the Constitution through regular legislation.
Doing this, the Supreme Court established the principle in judicial review and expanded the powers by having the power to declare a law unconstitutional.
Hope that helps your question.
