Which of these are true of super political action committees, but not of PACs? Select two answers.

1 answer:

6 0

The true statements about Super Political Action Committees (Super PACs) but not of PACs are 3. Super PACs enable unlimited donations. and 4. Super PACs have fewer government restrictions.

<h3>What is a Super PAC?</h3>

Super PACs are political action committees that do not contribute directly to campaigns. They are not allowed to coordinate or make contributions to candidate campaigns. Super PACs do not run political campaigns.

<h3>Answer Options:</h3>

1. Super PACs contribute directly to candidates’ campaigns.

2. Super PACs support candidates’ campaigns.

3. Super PACs enable unlimited donations.

4. Super PACs have fewer government restrictions.

5. Super PACs run political campaigns.

Thus, Super PACs, unlike PACs, enjoy unlimited donations with fewer government restrictions.

Learn more about Super PACs and PACs at brainly.com/question/3957884

You might be interested in

Which guideline helps historians place arguments in historical context?

SpyIntel [72]

B. historians shouldn't project modern ideas

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Difference between the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the 1965 Voting Rights Act.

PIT_PIT [208]

The Civil Rights Act that passed Congress in July 1964 did ban segregation in public accommodations. 6 1965, the Voting Rights Act banned literacy tests and other barriers to Black voting.

8 0

3 years ago

What is the Kellogg-Briand Pact?

Angelina_Jolie [31]

Answer:

The Kellogg–Briand Pact is a 1928 international agreement in which signatory states promised not to use war to resolve "disputes or conflicts of whatever nature or of whatever origin they may be, which may arise among them". There were no mechanisms for enforcement

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

What was a response by the states to the policy listed above?

JulsSmile [24]

Answer:

Explanation:

c is the answer sjdjdjdkdjdjjdkedk

6 0

3 years ago

Which u.s. supreme court decision rejected the “separate but equal” doctrine in higher education?

Marina86 [1]

Brown v. Board of Education (1954). The case ruled that segregated public schools were unconstitutional on the grounds that "separate could never be equal." The case overturned Plessy v. Ferguson, a landmark and deeply racist Supreme Court decision from 1896 that had allowed segregated education.

5 0

4 years ago