1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
slamgirl [31]
2 years ago
12

Gender Roles in the Renaissance

History
1 answer:
grigory [225]2 years ago
3 0
Women's lives did not improve at all if anything they were worsened. Rich woman during the renaissance had very little say in anything and was taught to help their husband run a business and take care of him and the house. The poor woman had no say in anything they only had to choices at life, they could either be a housewife and take care of the kids and the house ore they had to become a nun. The poor woman could not be single or have any rights.


The role of women was very scarce. Women were supposed to be seen and not heard. Rarely seen at that. Women were to be prim and proper, the ideal women. Females were able to speak their minds but their thoughts and ideas were shaped by men. Mostly everything women did had input given by men. Women were controlled by her parents from the day she is born until the day she is married, then she would be handed directly to her husband so he could take over that role. In the time of the renaissance, women were considered to legally belong to their husbands. Women were supposed to be typical ‘housewives.'

Though women were inferior to men, women in different classes had different roles. Low-class women were expected to be housewives and take care of everything to do with the house. The expectation of working-class women was a little bit different. These women were expected to work for their husbands and help them run their business. They would work alongside their husbands and then go home and take care of the household. Upper-class women may have had servants and workers working for them but the women were still expected to take care of the household.


Women could not work by themselves. Neither could they live alone if they were not married. If a woman was single, she was made to move in with one of her male relatives or join a convent and become a nun. There was no other option at this time for women.


In conclusion in different classes of women, the only women that were allowed to express themselves were upper-class women, but not sufficiently. The existence of women was there but it was a marginal existence. Very rarely would a woman of less than upper class be seen or heard expressing herself. It was unheard of. When women did express themselves, what they would express was tainted by male influence.

this is the citation I already put it through citation machine Gender Roles of Women in the Renaissance, www2.cedarcrest.edu/academic/eng/lfletcher/shrew/acloud.htm#:~:text=Mostly%20everything%20women%20did%20had,legally%20belong%20to%20their%20husbands.


Explanation:
please make mine the brainleist answer so i can get 19 more points. thank you
You might be interested in
HURRRY PLZ!!!! ASAP!!
lisov135 [29]
The enslaved people were transported from Africa to The Caribbean to grow Sugar.
Hope this helps!
7 0
2 years ago
The primary impetus for civil rights within the federal government came from
melisa1 [442]
<span>The primary impetus for civil rights within the federal government came from supreme court
In United states, the supreme court is the highest one in court hierarchy. When a case is handled by the supreme court, it overrides the previous decisions that were made by the lower courts regarding the case.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is not characteristic of the Tallmadge Amendment?
valentina_108 [34]

Which of the following is not characteristic of the Tallmadge Amendment?

As a group, the Southern representatives supported the amendment.


8 0
3 years ago
Will mark brainliest
tatyana61 [14]

Answer:

I'm not 100% sure but my guess would be longer work hours.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Why do you think the Mughal rules was successful in hindu majority state like india?
navik [9.2K]
Mughals succeeded in India because Indians had a vast mixture of the religious cultures and Mughals adopted some Hindu traditions in their culture and empire, as it was difficult to convert all Indian population into Islam, because of the great distance of the Mecca and Medina, from India. Mughals created a sub-culture by infusing various Hindu practices. They also improved the religious tolerance among people, and thus, succeeded in ruling India. 
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • John Adams believed about the early experiments of writing constitutions that a. The task was beneath the dignity of the elite.b
    9·1 answer
  • The dust bowl ruined over __________ acres of farmland during this time period.
    5·2 answers
  • The EEC (European Economic Community) permitted what after World War II?
    15·2 answers
  • Select the correct answer.
    12·2 answers
  • What would be considered a negative side effect of settling near a river bed
    11·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP THIS IS MY LAST QUESTION I CAN ASK!!!!
    13·1 answer
  • Which answer best explains the contributions of women during the Revolutionary War? Women were in charge of the horses and artil
    15·1 answer
  • Reasons for vietnam war
    7·1 answer
  • And then decided Caesar's
    11·1 answer
  • Sally drove quickly to the hospital is the word quickly an adjective or adverb
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!