Returns on investments, not wages
Option B
<u>
Explanation:
</u>
From the above statement it is observed that the individual Nathan is stated to be upper-class man who owns a mansion and other amenities and get pleasure from them.
The Nathan’s earnings had put him in this position to have a wealthy lifestyle. Actually he might have invested his income in the good ROI, which is stated has good return on investment.
He has made the right decisions at the right times that his fortunes have not declined and maintained the wealthy lifestyle by investing in the return on investment.
At the conclusion of the hearing, the judge committed Gault to juvenile detention for six years, until he turned 21.
Answer:
The original names of the New England Colonies were the Province of New Hampshire, later New Hampshire, the Province of Massachusetts Bay, later Massachusetts and Maine, the Colony of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, later Rhode Island and the Connecticut Colony, later Connecticut.
Explanation:
<em> </em>I hope this helps! :)
Answer:
Bob contributed to his injury and apportioned damages
Explanation:
Under pure form of comparative negligence, a defendant is only responsible for the proportion of fault arising out of his negligence. The plaintiff is still allowed a compensation against damages even if he himself contributed to such a fault.
Comparative negligence mentions that whenever an accident takes place, the total negligence is a sum of proportionate negligence by each party, which contributed to such accident.
In such case, the negligence for an accident cannot be placed upon one party alone.
In the given case, since Bob filed a suit in a state that adopts pure form of comparative negligence, he shall be eligible to some compensation even if the fault was majorly his. Though, the quantum of compensation shall be based upon the determined fault of each party to the accident.
<span>This is true. This model gives managers the ability to understand the types of people they will be leading, and bases it on the ability for a person to critically think about directives and how well the person engages with others. A brown-noser, in this instance, is a person who will not think critically about a directive, deciding to follow anything the leader gives to them, as well as engaging with this leader often, trying to get in their good graces.</span>
