Answer:
<u>Account Name</u> <u>Balance Sheet Classification</u> <u>DR or CR Balance
</u>
1. Accounts Receivable CA Debit
2. Prepaid Expense CA Debit
3. Inventories CA Debit
4. Long-Term Debt NCL Credit
5. Cash and Cash Equivalent CA Debit
6. Accounts Payable CL Credit
7. Income Tax Payable CL Credit
8. Contributed Capital SE Credit
9. Property Plant and Equipment NCA Debit
10. Retained Earning SE Credit
11. Short-Term Borrowing CL Credit
12. Accrued Liabilities CL Credit
13. Goodwill (an Intangible Asset) NCA Debit
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is D.
Explanation:
A scope limitation in audit means circumstances hindering an auditor from carrying out his duties according to the audit procedure. A scope limitation can make an auditor issue a qualified opinion or a disclaimer of opinion depending on the materiality of the issue.
Back to the question, a scope limitation sufficient to preclude an unqualified opinion always will result when management refuses to provide a representation letter acknowledging its responsibility for the fair presentation of the financial statements in conformity with General Accepted Accounting Principle (GAAP)
Answer:
A)
Since the money supply is growing at a much faster rate than real GDP in the US, this means that the inflation rate in the US will be higher than the inflation rate in the UK. In both countries the money supply is growing at a faster rate, but the difference in the US is larger (money supply is growing 67% faster that real GDP), while the money supply in the UK is growing 20% faster than real GDP.
This means that the US dollar should depreciate against the British pound.
B)
If you have US dollars, then you should increase your investments in the UK because the pound will be worth more US dollars in the future.
C)
More American goods should be exported to the UK, and less British goods should be imported to the US. Since the US dollar should be cheaper, American products are cheaper. The opposite will happen to British products.
Answer:
Explanation:
Yes, Disparate Impact Theory can be used in this case relating to the processes of subjective selection such as interrogations. If a discriminatory workplace practice has an unfair and aggressive impact on minorities, it may be in violation of Title VII. Professional individual employees who support on the basis of discretionary judgments without intending to do so are engaging in biased conduct.
The case of Watson V. Fort Worth Bank & Trust will be used to support my claim. Clara Watson turned down a promotion that was contingent on an interview under this scenario.
The U.s. Supreme Court Declared that a Title VII claim to a strategy of subjection enforcement can only be investigated under the unequal care principle. In the majority decision, the Court allowed the principle of (disparate effects) to apply to arbitrarily defined work practices.
