All categories

2 years ago

what are the similarites and differences between the business ventures of the wander girls and roxanne quimby

Business

1 answer:

Dimas [21]2 years ago

8 0

People are known to engage in business every day. The answers to the question is below;

<h3>The similarities between the business ventures of the Wander Girls and Roxanne Quimby</h3>

Their businesses are both founded by women.
They both encourages women in business ventures and other areas.
They both encourages women to take care of themselves and not neglect themselves.
They are advocate for self love for women.

<h3>The differences between the business ventures of the Wander Girls and Roxanne Quimby.</h3>

Wander Girls are into travels specifically for women while Roxanne Quimby is into personal-care brand.

Wander Girls is into service delivery while the other is into product delivery.

Roxanne Quimby is famous as she sell Burts Bees, a natural personal care brand. Elisha Brock, is known to be the founder of Wander Girls. It is an online community that aids and encouraging women to take themselves out by travel with the right resources and person.

Learn more about Business from

brainly.com/question/24553900

You might be interested in

What are types of opportunity costs

MatroZZZ [7]

Answer:

This distinction gives rise to two types of opportunity cost--explicit and implicit.

1:Explicit Cost: This is an opportunity cost that involves a money payment and usually a market transaction. ...

2:Implicit Cost: This is an opportunity cost that DOES NOT involve a money payment or market transaction.

3 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

During the current year, the company had the following summarized activities: Purchased short-term investments for $10,000 cash.

aivan3 [116]

Answer:

short-term investment 10,000 debit

cash 10,000 credit

note receivables 5,000 debit

cash 5,000 credit

equipment 18,000 debit

cash 5,000 credit

note payable 13,000 credit

cash 11,000 debit

common stock 1,000 credit

additional CS 10,000 credit

cash 9,000 debit

note payable 9,000 credit

Patents 3,000 credit

cash 3,000 debit

Building 24,000 debit

cash 8,000 credit

note payable 16,000 credit

cash 1,000 debit

equipment 1,000 credit

Explanation:

To record the entries we need to alwasy make debit = credit

we must use account names to represent each concept which are quite easy you don't have to overthink ou write what it is telling you it happen

Whe nthe company use cash use cash account

when it purchase equipment use equiptment

7 0

4 years ago

A lender advertises 80% LTV conventional loans. 80% is applied to: Select one: a. Appraised value b. Selling price c. The buyers

AveGali [126]

The purchase price or appraised value, whichever is lower, is the correct option when considering loan-to-value ratio in mortgage lending

What does an 80% loan-to-value ratio mean?

The loan-to-value ratio means the percentage of the property worth that the borrower could receive as a loan from the financial institution, which means that the remaining percentage after having deducted the loan-to-value ratio from 100% would be financed by the borrower, which serves as a way to avoid default.

Ordinarily, the loan-to-value ratio is applied to the lower of the selling price or the appraised value of the property, but note that a selling price to one party is the purchase price to another, hence, option d is the most correct

brainly.com/question/4033785

#SPJ1

5 0

2 years ago

Use Annual Cost Analysis to determine whether Alternative A or B should be chosen. The analysis period is 5 years. Assume an int

emmasim [6.3K]

Answer:

A should be chosen, because its equivalent annual cost is $252.15 lower than Alternative B's.

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

Interest rate = 6% per year

Alternative A Alternative B

Initial Cost 2800 6580

Annual Benefit 450 940

Salvage Value 500 1375

Useful Life (yrs) 5 5

Annuity factor = 4.212 for 5 years at 6%.

Present value factor = 0.747 for 5 years at 6%.

Alternative A Alternative B

Present value of

annual benefits $1,895.40 $3,959.28

PV of salvage value 373.50 1,027.12

Total present value

of benefits $2,268.90 $4,986.40

Initial Cost 2,800 6,580

Net present value $531.10 $1,593.60

The equivalent annual cost

= NPV/PV annuity factor

($531.10/4.212) ($1,593.60/4.212)

Equivalent annual cost $126.09 $378.35

Difference:

Alternative B = $378.35

Alternative A = $126.09

Difference = $252.26

3 0

3 years ago

Joe is an accountant and plans to join a group of accountants. he compares a group in a general partnership with a group in a li

Tatiana [17]

The thing that would interest him the most and is an advantage is that if one partner were to make a mistake, he would not be held accountable for it. Unlike the general partnership where everyone gets equal blame for the downfall of a company, in limited liability it is known what falls under whose jurisdiction and if someone causes the company to go bankrupt, the ones whose fault it's not can't get sued.

8 0

4 years ago