Answer: Yes
Explanation: In the above case, a quasi-contract was formed. This is when a bilateral contract is not in place but one party will enjoy the benefit of the activities of the other party and may be enriched by it.
A bilateral agreement is the exchange of a promise for another and in this case would have been, the promise that Dozier would pay for Paschall’s work. This was not established, however, Dozier will benefit from Paschall’s work unduly if he does not pay for the improvements. The law holds that he has to pay for Paschall’s work to prevent being unjustly enriched.
Answer: $4.24
Explanation:
According to the Put-Call Parity, the value would be expressed by;
Put Price = Call price - Stock price + Exercise price *e^-(risk free rate *T)
T is 90 days out of 365 so = 90/365
= 2.65 - 26 + 28 * 2.71 ^ (-0.06 * 90/365)
= $4.24
Explanation:
The correct journal entry is as follows:
Cash Dr $90
Service revenue Dr $560
To Account receivable $650
(Being the cash received is recorded)
Basically we debited the cash for $90 and service revenue for $560 and credited the account receivable for $650 so that the correct posting could be done
The cash difference is
= $650 - $560
= $90
If the aggregate demand is increasing while the price level remains constant, it means that the spending and consumption in a macroeconomic setting is increasing. Given the constant range prices, consumers are now able to spend more therefore pushing the demand higher.
