Answer: A set of rules
Explanation:
We need the “following” options in order to answer the question. What are your multiple choice answers? The question is too broad to even begin to answer without what the question is aimed toward. I’m sure that you’ll get immediate response once you give the answer: “which of the following”, stated in the body of the question. Sorry.
(1) Consensus paradigm – A community of like-minded individuals that agree on goals important for survival and view laws as necessary to achieve those goals (2) Conflict paradigm – the society is quelled in a conflict of interests.
Answer:
1. we already have laws
2. banning the use of guns is unconstitutional (2nd amendment)
3. it's not the gun itself but the person behind the gun
4. gun control has been proven to be unsuccessful (look at Australia's homicide rates with various weapons)
5. banning or limiting guns restricts our access to protection against other people, corrupt government, etc
Explanation:
for #3, more ppl stop school shootings, mass murders, etc. before they happen, but they never show up on the news bc it's not a good enough story. social media and even the news nowadays is super biased, never shows all of the facts, and exaggerates things, so don't believe everything you see on the internet.
Answer:
In Griffin v. California, the U.S. Supreme Court rules that the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination not only allows a criminal defendant to refuse to take the witness stand during his trial, but it also bars the prosecutor from urging the jury to interpret that silence as an indication that the defendant has something to hide. The Court reasons that the right against self-incrimination would be meaningless if a defendant’s exercise of the right could be used against him.
Hope this helps
