Answer:
it depends
Explanation:
you should finish what you started, so you can achieve your goal and if you start something you dont enjoy your shouldn't continue because you would be wasting your time on things you hate than doing the things you enjoy.
if you start something you that you are bad at, always remember, a quitter never wins but a failure always win.
Although the question is incomplete, I will provide you with a general answer in relation to carrying out an Investigation.
<h3>What are the procedures for carrying out an Investigation of an Accident?</h3>
During an investigation, it is important for one to:
- Respond Immediately; the next step is to
- Gather Information; then
- Release the scene
- Carry out an Analysis
- Create a report based on the Analysis
- Share the findings with those who can help
- Enact changes that will prevent the accident from repeating itself.
<h3>What is the Purpose of Carrying out an investigation?</h3>
The purpose of carrying out an investigation is:
- To determine who or what is liable
- To enforce the applicable laws
- To ensure that the same crime, accident, or negative event does not occur again.
Learn more bout Carrying out an Investigation at:
brainly.com/question/25045475
Answer:
if I were juror in murder case, the I would conduct all the scientific evidence, and if it still conflicts with ALL the witnesses I would not believe the witnesses. but I still would not announce my decision. I would want more evidences and proofs to announce my decision because I just can't rely only on scientific evidence, (what if the person who murdered changed the fingerprints and other scientific evidence, you never know)
Answer:
It's the health care workers they did not teach the resident about the disease or the medication. Also it's the resident right to not take the medicine because it's there body and health but the healthcare also should educate.
That a government action violates the Establishment Clause of the United States' constitution if it lacks a secular purpose, has its primary effect as promoting or inhibiting religion, or fosters an excessive entanglement of government with religion.
Used to assess whether a law violates the Establishment Clause. The "Establishment Clause" was intended to prevent any governmental endorsement or support of religion.
