Answer:
Issues for the disputants to consider in preparation for the mediation session:
1.Adversarial System:
b. What is your starting position (demand)? What are your underlying interests (what do you really want)?
c. What is the best conceivable outcome from your perspective?
2.Inquisitorial System:
a. What are your concerns? How would you state the issue in the dispute?
d. What do you think the starting position and underlying interests of the other side will be?
e. Identify two workable solutions that would solve the conflict.
Explanation:
In an adversarial system, the court act as a referee in the legal contest between the prosecution and the defence. In an inquisitorial system, the court is actively involved in the proof of facts as the judge carries out investigations regarding the issues in order to establish the facts. France practises the inquisitorial system, whereas the United States practises the adversarial system.
It really depends on the situation, the kind of relationship, and the person. are you happy in your relationship? or do you feel like being with this person is exhausting you? if someone came up to you and gave you a chance to leave, would you feel relief to be leaving the person? so yeah, it just depends on how much you want to be with them
The correct answer is "It is best described as an anecdote".
We consider an anecdote to be a personal account or retelling of a particular event or incident. The key word here is "personal". In the example given, we clearly see how <u>the point of view is from the protagonist of a certain personal experience he had and the way he felt about it, constituting it as an anecdote.</u>
We don't know for a fact Utopians don't care about riches, because we're only getting a single man's experience which in addition, cannot be proven.
An analogy recquires some sort of strong comparisson of metaphor that isn't really present in this excerpt.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
the answer is in mr.johnsy,so u have to ask mr.johnsy
u welcome:v
