1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alina [70]
2 years ago
9

Can anyone explain why this two is being added before the integral? Does it have something to do with integral symmetry?

Mathematics
2 answers:
PIT_PIT [208]2 years ago
5 0

Yes it's exactly due to symmetry. Specifically, symmetry about the x axis.

Simply writing \displaystyle \int_{-8}^{-4}\left[\sqrt{x+8} \ \right]dx, without the 2 out front, will only get you the area of the portion shown in red (see diagram below).

The blue region has equal area of the red region due to symmetry.

So,

\displaystyle 2\int_{-8}^{-4}\left[\sqrt{x+8} \ \right]dx

represents the red and blue regions combined.

The portion in green is \displaystyle \int_{-4}^{8}\left[\sqrt{x+8} - \frac{x}{2} \ \right]dx which is the integral of the difference of the upper and lower curves over the interval -4 \le x \le 8

---------------

In all honesty, it's probably easier to integrate with respect to y since the given functions are in terms of y initially. Also, there isn't a junction point in which the curves swap places in terms of which one is larger. However, it doesn't hurt to have practice in integrating with respect to x.

If you're curious about what the y integral looks like, then it would be

\displaystyle \int_{-2}^{4} \bigg[ (2y) - (y^2-8)\bigg] dy

You can use a tool like WolframAlpha to check that both integral expressions result in 36 to help confirm that they represent the same overall area (just in different ways of course).

statuscvo [17]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Yes - see attached sketch and explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

As you have a sideways parabola, you would need to split the integral into 3 parts.  

Find the x coordinate where the parabola first intersects the line: x = - 4.

Now you should be able to see that the parabola between where it intersects the x-axis (x = -8) and the line x = -4 can be split into 2 equal parts (above and below the x-axis).  I have shaded these parts as blue and red on my attached sketch.

As the areas above and below the x-axis and the parabola are equal, this can be written as 2 x the area ABOVE the x-axis (the positive integral). So yes, this is why the 2 has been added before the integral, as without the 2 the integral is finding the area ABOVE the x-axis and the parabola curve ONLY.

Then you would find the area between the parabola and the line between x = -4 and x = 8 (shaded grey on my sketch), and as it's only the positive part of the parabola, a normal "integral between 2 curves" can be applied, i.e.

\int\limits^a_b {(top-bottom)} \, dx

You might be interested in
Equivalent expression of (m^1/3m^1/5)^0
Lapatulllka [165]

Answer:

\large\boxed{\left(m^\frac{1}{3}m^\frac{1}{5}\right)^0=1\ \text{if}\ m\neq0}

Step-by-step explanation:

\text{We know}\\\\a^0=1\ \text{for all value of}\ a\ \text{except 0}\\\\\left(m^\frac{1}{3}m^\frac{1}{5}\right)^0=1\ \text{if}\ m\neq0

7 0
3 years ago
How many points need to be removed from this graph so that it will be a function?
leva [86]
You didn't add a graph lol
5 0
2 years ago
Write a two-step word problem that has an answer of 7 pages
riadik2000 [5.3K]
Sarah has 1 more book than 3 times the number of books Andy has. Andy has 2 books.  How many books does Sarah has?

HOPE THIS HELPS! :)
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the solution to 2log↓g(x)=log↓g8+log↓g(x-2)? ​
trapecia [35]

Answer:

x = 4

Step-by-step explanation:

2log_9(x)=log_98+log_9(x-2) \\ log_9( {x}^{2} )=log_9 \{8 \times (x-2) \} \\ {x}^{2} =8 \times (x-2)  \\  {x}^{2}  = 8x - 16 \\  {x}^{2}  - 8x + 16 = 0 \\ (x - 4)^{2}  = 0 \\ x - 4 = 0 \\  \huge \red { \boxed{x = 4}}

4 0
3 years ago
L1 y= - 4/3x+3 and L2 y=5/4x-3 <br><br> Are parallel, perpendicular, or intersecting (neither)?
Ksenya-84 [330]

Answer:

the lines are intersecting

Step-by-step explanation:

We can immediately eliminate the possibility of a parallel pair of lines because one of the slopes of the lines is negative guiding us towards the answer being perpendicular/intersecting. But the lines aren't perpendicular either. This is because of a pair of lines to be perpendicular, their slopes have to be the opposite of each other. For example, a perpendicular line for y= -4/3x+3 could be y=4/3x-3. The y intercept does not effect the lines from being perpendicular or parallel at all. So we conclude with the choice that the lines can only be intersecting.

If you are confused by anything at all, don't be afraid to ask :)

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A classmate simplifies the expression in exercise 1. is the expression he wrote equivalent to the original expression? explain.
    15·1 answer
  • The diameter of a ping pong ball is 4.0cm. find the length in kilometers of a row of 6.02×1023 ping pong balls.
    9·2 answers
  • What is the slope and y-intercept of 2x-8y=x+16?
    5·2 answers
  • A 15.6 inch laptop is featured in a scale as for $799. This distance is the diagonal distance across the screen. If the screen m
    9·2 answers
  • What is 2+2+3+3+3+..............
    7·2 answers
  • Hey bro's help me!!​
    6·2 answers
  • In a marathon,mike finished ahead of fred.emma finished after fred.john finished after agnes and agnes finished later than emma.
    10·1 answer
  • 20 points and 5 stars..........
    15·2 answers
  • If the food bill is $38.92, then what would the tip be if you want to leave a tip of 15%?
    8·1 answer
  • Solve the equation 3x + 4 = 5x - 8​
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!