<u>Answer</u>:
The first world war created various hardships that women had to endure along with opportunities they were able to enjoy.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Women’s work has never been considered as same as of men and never have been valued equally as of men. During the first world war, Men were not being available to work for the country as they were in the battle fields. Women took over all the works that were previously done by men, be it munition factories, bankers, bus conductors, drivers, working in mills, or any other work that was previously done by men.
This made them realise their capability and they starting fighting for their rights. Even though they were doing the same work producing the same amount of output, they were still paid less.
This makes women to fought for their freedom and their denied rights. Some women started getting paid the same as men after their struggle and the right to vote for women was given after the first world war.
1527 - Spain to the united states
Answer:
hope the answers helped you. pls mark as brainliest
Explanation:
In 1831, Alexis de Tocqueville took a 10-month trip to the United States to study the American penal system. In the resulting book—Democracy in America—he singled out one noteworthy feature: “Amongst the novel objects that attracted my attention during my stay in the United States, nothing struck me more forcibly than the general equality of conditions.” Although he ignored the fact of slavery, his reference to economic equality among white Americans was, at the time, accurate. According to economic historians Peter H. Lindert and Jeffrey G. Williamson, the share of national income going to the top one percent was less than 10 percent.Today, the share of national income going to the top one percent has doubled, while median wages have remained largely stagnant. In the last 40 years, CEO wages have grown nearly 100 times the rate of wages for average workers. The popularity of left-wing candidates like Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders—both with significant redistributive policies at the core of their platform—reflects the moral concerns many have about high levels of income inequality.
But no moral case for economic equality will convince those on the Right. What is at stake is an idea of fairness. It is unfair, so the thought goes, for others to live off one’s labor without making an equally productive contribution to society. This appeal to fairness trumps any moral case for income redistribution. There is, however, another case for relative equality of conditions that appeals to the same idea of fairness that’s appealed to by the opponents of redistribution. This view, which has largely been neglected since Tocqueville’s meditations on the subject, argues that a certain degree of economic equality is necessary for fair participation in political life.
Answer:
Technology
Explanation:
has become so ingrained in society that it's hard to remember ... For many of us fully immersed in the digital age, it's hard to imagine a world before the ... Using mobile devices and computers is bad for our posture.
