1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MrMuchimi
3 years ago
5

ENGLISH EXPERTS!!!!!!WILL GIVE BRALIEST!!!! PLEASE HELP FOR THESE ARE MY LAST QUESTION!!! AT LEAST TAKE A LOOK!!! EASY I AM JUST

DUMB!
3. Read the following excerpt from a persuasive text. Then, evaluate the way the author builds their argument. Look for logical fallacies, discuss the author’s credibility, examine the eidence they use, and reach a conclusion about the overall effectiveness of this piece.

I think chemicals are deadly. Chemicals shouldn’t be used in the food we eat. Chemicals are dangerous for plants and animals, too. If we keep using too many chemicals, they will pollute the earth and make everyone sick. A study said that chemicals are even causing honeybees to die! Whenever my little brother eats processed food with too many chemicals, like cereal, candy, or chips, he gets hyperactive for hours. Do yourself and the environment a favor and kick chemicals to the curb!
English
2 answers:
xeze [42]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:  The author makes a strong opening statement, but should avoid "I think.. ."   Let the statement stand on its own merits. "Chemicals are deadly."  It is then evident that this is an over-generalization.

Not all chemicals are deadly. Many are beneficial. It may be true that her brother is affected by some of the chemicals in the food he eats, and it would be better for him to eat more natural foods with fewer chemical additives.

The reference to "a study said. . ." would be much more credible if the author had named the source of the study, or the credentials of the researcher who did the study. It would be good to specify "insecticides" or "pesticides" responsible for killing bees.

The conclusion is a good call to action, but again, too general. I like the alliteration of "kick the chemicals to the curb" but there might be a way to say "Be thougthtful about the chemicals you use, and the additives you consume; when possible, do yourself and the environment a favor and kick chemicals to the curb!"

Explanation:

bonufazy [111]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

chemicals are deadly- the author had stated his/her opinion strongly, they cause the reader to be scared of chemicals by using a very effective word "deadly"

Chemicals are dangerous for plants and animals, too- the author states a fact showing that it is dangerous for things that we eat. This builds up their argument because it is showing that we are in danger because of it

will pollute the earth and make everyone sick.- this is warning people on what can happen using the words pollute and sick is very effective because pollute means to much of it and it is just their and will continue to build up and make people sick

Do yourself and the environment a favor and kick chemicals to the curb- this phrase shows people that getting rid of chemicals is helping us and our environment so there shouldn't be a reason to fear getting rid of chemicals and that it isn't a necessity.

-Ac<3

You might be interested in
I logged out and it won’t let me log back in
Oxana [17]
You might need to create a new password maybe that’s what I had to do it gets to acting weird sometimes it needs medical attention lol
4 0
2 years ago
Rewrite the sentences in passive form. Omit the agent where necessary
labwork [276]

Explanation:

2. A children's playground was built in the park snow.

3. Photography was not allowed in the museum

4. the colosseum had been built by vespasian in 70-80 AD

8 0
2 years ago
The levels of usage can be classed as intimate conference frozen
Kruka [31]
Hello!

This question is incomplete, with insufficient information to supply a sufficient answer.  Please PM me the full question, and I'll be more than happy to answer it!  

Have a wonderful day! :)

-L
7 0
3 years ago
How was Samuel Johnson's dictionary different from previous dictionaries of the English language?
Genrish500 [490]
The correct answer is B. It used literary excerpts to illustrate word usage.

Johnson used excerpts from well known books to show how different words are used which was a completely new idea, revolutionary one, since the previous dictionaries showed what the word mean and were sometimes difficult to understand.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Suppose a character in a story volunteers to teach English overseas, even though his parents disagree with his decision and he w
Finger [1]

The correct answer is D. A good life comes from doing what makes you happy. Teaching English is what the character really wishes to do whereas his parents obviously think about the financial prospects and not about what makes their son happy.  

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which sentence contains a dangling modifier? A.) having read your letter, my German Shepherd will stay inside after dark. B)When
    11·2 answers
  • I know it easy but please help me
    15·1 answer
  • I need a sentence with the word churn
    11·2 answers
  • The first step in her downward course was in her ceasing to instruct me. She now commenced to practice her husband's precepts. S
    7·1 answer
  • Can you guys answer this question, thanks will mark brainliest.
    5·1 answer
  • Help cause I am confused n I rlly don’t get it
    6·1 answer
  • Are you familiar with measuring using a ruler? When have you ever used a ruler to measure, and who taught you how to use the rul
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following would not work as a supporting paragraph of a
    8·2 answers
  • Who is Mrs. Flynn and how does she react to Charlie?
    15·1 answer
  • Part B: Which of the following phrases from paragraph 5 of the text best supports the answer to Part A?(2 Points)
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!