As a narrator, Montresor can best be described as an unreliable narrator.
Explanation:
In most cases involving reading and/or literature, an unreliable narrator refers to a narrator who cannot be depended on or trusted. This is typically present in first person narration. In “The Cask of Amontillado,” Montresor is most viewed as an unreliable narrator because for one, he’s a character in the story he is narrating, which already deems his perspective to be likely to be untrue. Additionally, he has a set view of Fortunato that is biased. This is shown where he says that Fortunato wronged him, but the way that Fortunato wronged him is never explicitly mentioned in the story. To add to this, the plot of the story overall clearly displays Montresor’s manipulation. If you ask me, it seems he was the one who wronged Fortunato. The narrator also does not reveal everything about the past and what May have led him to say Fortunato wronged him. Because of this misconception, Montresor is seen as an unreliable narrator.
Answer:
I disagree that the moral of Boyle’s tale is that the sturdy should now not help the weak. I think the ethical of the story is how a short choice can have severe consequences. For example in the tale they sprayed the DDT to stop the horrible mosquito and problem not knowing the effects it would have. The results have been terrible the caterpillars that used to get eaten via the mosquitoes had been no longer getting ate and as an alternative they had been consuming the roofs which result in rain getting into the huts. Then there has been a hassle with flies so they decided to spray once more which lead to the lizards consuming the flies that were contaminated
Answer:
They form the argument’s main point.
Explanation:
In a written argument reasons and evidence form the argument's main point. There has to be an explanation that is backed by actual evidence for that argument existing in the first place, otherwise the entire argument is made mute. The involved characters in the argument usually go to certain lengths to win/resolve the argument but if the entire argument is not backed by reasons and evidence then it opens up huge plot holes as the characters are making all their choices for no actual reason.
If we study the yearly reports on accidents that took place in the USA, the common percentage that is displayed every year rounds about a thirty percent of the total accidents. However, there is always a slight shift of 0.2 to 2.0 percent for the same, every year. So it is almost clear that 30% of the total accidents (in a year) occur due to alcohol.
Therefore, the blank must be filled with the word that is mentioned in bold and is underlined:
Alcohol use, .... pedestrian, was ..... almost <u>one-third </u>of all ... crashes involving ... fatalities.
In my opinion, this is the best-suited answer without any options provided.
Answer:
- Objective tone.
Explanation:
The tone is demonstrated as the author's attitude or approach towards a particular subject matter that is reflected through the word-choice(diction), language, and style used by the author. It provides the readers with a perspective to look at the text and evoke feelings as intended by the author.
As per the question, '<u>objective tone</u>' is elucidated as the 'impersonal style of writing adopted by the author in which he/she presents the information factually and even-handedly without including his/her personal thoughts or opinions.' Such a tone involves factual claims supported by sufficient evidence that establishes the credibility of the author as well as the claim.
