Answer:
B. We can end our dependence on fossil fuels if we rely on a
combination of clean energy sources and lower energy usage.
A doesn't include information from Source 1.
C doesn't include information from Source 2.
D doesn't include information from both sources.
Explanation:
Hope this helps.
When a sentence uses the active voice, the subject of the
sentence performs the verb as in the following sentence:
The boy kicked the ball.
Here we see that the boy is performing the action of
kicking.
When the subject of the sentence has the action performed to
it, then, that is what is called the passive as in the following sentence:
The ball was kicked by the boy.
Here we see that the subject, the ball, was receiving the
action/verb of being kicked.
An apostrophe is used to signify ownership. To figure out whether or not the apostrophe is used correctly look at these examples:
My mom's dog is adorable. Correct Use of apostrophe
(Who owns the dog? Answer: Mom owns the dog. The apostrophe shows her ownership.)
Dog's are so adorable. Incorrect use of apostrophe. (The dog isn't owning anything or has possession of anything so the use of the apostrophe here is incorrect.)
Answer:
among many who have been killed because Stand Your Ground law.
Explanation:
In the article "Jordan Davis's Mother: Don't Use My Son's Death to Expand Stand Your Ground" author Lucy McBath describes how people try to get away with law bill because Lucy McBath's son is among many who have been killed because of Stand Your Ground law.
McBath develops the fact that her son's killer spending life time in prison through the provision of Stand Your Ground law is not how justice should be served.
Stating, "Don't you dare use my son's name to justify your support for this reckless bill." This shows that the bill is not to be used as an example of securing justice because the criminal does not really get acquitted with the right punishment.
Furthermore, the author states, "Stand Your Ground laws make all of us more vulnerable to the threat of gun violence, but they also have a disproportionate impact on communities of color."
This evidence develops the central idea because many people use this law as a defence card after they are charged with murder or violence.
In the end, it is all about a mother losing a child to a reckless law which could've been avoided if lawmakers understood the grief of gun violence.
