The argument that uses a non sequitur fallacy is C, "Regulations on motorists should be lifted because factories are a bigger source of pollution"
Explanation: Non sequitur fallacy is when the conclusion doesn't follow the premises. That said in different words, the premises is an irrelevant reason to support the conclusion.
So, as true as it is that factories are a bigger source of pollution, the conclusion does not follow from the premises. The fact that regulations on motorists should be lifted, does not necessarily mean that the reason to do that is that factories are a bigger source of pollution.
Answer: You gotta give us the paragraphs.
Explanation: Really man. Common sense!?
Answer:
Gravity
Explanation:
The hummingbird beats its wings to hover as it is pushing against the force gravity to hover. E.g. Without gravity an apple would never fall as it is the force that causes it to do so.
Someone courageous, someone doing something with courage.
Street theater and the stage
