Parallelism --> which is basically a uniform sturcture.
so in this poem, the author has a structure that contains a past tense verb and ends with a certain body part.
past tense verbs: brushed, bathed, drawm
body partsL hair, hands, feet
Answer:
1. I expected the play to end with some philosophical or moral message, as it actually ended, as it shows that alienation, paranoia and panic make people easy targets to manipulate.
2. I thought that there were no aliens when at the beginning of the play, where the neighborhood was affected by factors that can happen normally, such as the drop in electricity supply, the existence of introverted people and problems with cars and phones.
3. I believed that aliens existed when the shadow that took over the city appeared and when the aliens did appear.
Explanation:
"The Monsters Are Due on Maple Street" tells the story of a city that had several problems with electricity supply and telephone and television signals, after a giant shadow overtook the city and a very strong flash was seen by all. Cars also began to malfunction, leaving all residents concerned. The townspeople started to think that this was caused by aliens and started to distrust each other, thinking that the neighbors were beings from another planet. This caused great hysteria and paranoia in everyone, driving the city into complete chaos. In the end we learned that the shadow and the malfunction of things were being caused by aliens themselves, who were trying to discover how panic and paranoia allowed human beings to be manipulated.
Answer:
Link Deas
Explanation:
Link Deas gets up and begins yelling in Tom's defense, saying he “ain't had a speck o'trouble outa him,” which gets him ejected from the courtroom. he is kicked out because it disrupts the order of the courtroom
Answer: B
Explanation: a summation is a final statement that a lawyer gives to the judge to encourage the judge that their client is not guilty.
answer d is wrong because jurors don't solely decide whether the client is guilty or not
answer c is wrong because a summation has nothing to do with the "judges instruction"
Answer a is wrong because a summation is a closing statement that the lawyer makes.
