1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alenkinab [10]
3 years ago
10

2. What was the fate of the civilians of Nanking?

History
2 answers:
cricket20 [7]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

An estimated 40,000 to over 300,000 Chinese were killed.[11][12] Since most Japanese military records on the killings were kept secret or destroyed shortly after the surrender of Japan in 1945, historians have been unable to accurately estimate the death toll of the massacre. In 1946, the International Military Tribunal for the Far East in Tokyo estimated that over 200,000 Chinese were killed in the massacre.[13] China's official estimate is "more than 300,000" dead, based on the evaluation of China's own Nanjing War Crimes Tribunal in 1947. The death toll has been contested by scholars since at least the 1980s.[3][14]

The Chinese government has been accused by many Japanese of exaggerating details surrounding the massacre, such as the death toll.[12][15][16][17] The government of Japan has admitted to the killing of many non-combatants, looting, and other violence committed by the Imperial Japanese Army after the fall of Nanjing,[18][19] and Japanese veterans who served there have confirmed that a massacre took place.[20] In Japan, public opinion of the massacre varies, but few deny outright that the event occurred.[21] A small but vocal minority in the Japanese government and society have argued that the death toll was military in nature and that no such crimes ever occurred. Denial of the massacre and revisionist accounts of the killings have become a staple of Japanese nationalism.[21] Historical negationists go as far as claiming the massacre was fabricated for propaganda purposes.[22]

Explanation:

Vladimir79 [104]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The Nanjing Massacre or the ### of Nanjing (formerly written as Nanking Massacre or #### of Nanking) was an episode of mass murder and mass #### committed by Imperial Japanese troops against the residents of Nanjing (Nanking), at that time the capital of China, during the Second Sino-Japanese War (1937–1945). The massacre occurred over a period of six weeks starting on December 13, 1937, the day that the Japanese captured Nanjing. During this period, soldiers of the Imperial Japanese Army murdered tens or hundreds of thousands of disarmed combatants and unarmed Chinese civilians, and perpetrated widespread #### and looting. The event remains a contentious political issue and an obstacle in Sino-Japanese relations. The controversy surrounding the massacre also remains a central issue in Japanese relations with other East Asian nations, such as South Korea.

Explanation:

They were extremely brutal and you should not do this to anyone.

the #### are taggings of words that are not allowed on this website.

the word is an unwilling sex

You might be interested in
What is your guys favorite singer. if yours is one of my favorites I'll mark you as brainliest​
lisov135 [29]

Answer:

juice wrld

Explanation:

he is an inspiration he shows us that if you giving believing your dreams nothing is possible he music helps people with are mentally challenged

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
during the 19ty century many latin american nations experienced revolutiona. how important were amerivan and french revolutions
olya-2409 [2.1K]

Between 1808 and 1826 all of Latin America except the Spanish colonies of Cuba and Puerto Rico slipped ... Many Creoles (those of Spanish parentage but who were born in America) felt Bourbon policy to be an unfair ...

8 0
3 years ago
In what way might the Allies benefit from Germany’s decision to fight on two fronts?
vredina [299]
<span>The Allies might attack Germany on the French side because the Germans had no troops at that border.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did Andrew Jackson describe the election of 1824 as a "corrupt bargain"?
Vadim26 [7]
Andrew jackson describe the election of 1824 as a corrupt bargain because he thought south carolina voted for John Quincy adams in order to make it easier to Secede. 
Back then, John Quincy simply doesn't have enough vote to be considered as the winning candidate, making the credibility of the election really questionable

hope this helps
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Popol Vuh was the
liberstina [14]

Answer:

Maya creation myth

Explanation:

The Popol Vuh is the Mayan book of mythology. Mythology usually has to do with divine people, so it makes sense that it would be about creation.

Have a wonderful day! :D

3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • 20+ POINTS AND WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
    14·2 answers
  • Explain how America and Japan went from being friends to enemies.
    9·1 answer
  • What century did the spanish and american war take place?
    9·2 answers
  • When did the second great awakening occur?
    10·2 answers
  • what arguments do jefferson and dickson repeat in the olive branch petition and declaration of the causes and necessity of takin
    5·1 answer
  • An iron curtain has descended across the continent. Behind that line lie all the capitals of the ancient states of Central and E
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following best states Alexander Hamilton’s attitude toward the conflict between Great Britain and France?
    10·2 answers
  • How was the Black Death spread throughout Europe?
    13·1 answer
  • Why did the US care about WW1
    13·1 answer
  • भारतीय संविधान के चार एकात्मक लक्ष्ण लिखिए।<br><br><br>​
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!