Answer:
<h2>
D. Europe</h2>
Explanation:
The western members of the Allies (Britain, France and the United States) and their wartime partner in the alliance, the Soviet Union, were at odds over how Europe would be governed after the war. The Western democracies wanted free and open elections in the countries of Eastern Europe coming out from under Nazi domination. The Soviet Union wanted states allied and aligned with it to prevent any future aggression against the USSR (like how Germany had invaded). The USSR ended up heavily influencing the Eastern European countries to align with communism, bringing them behind what Winston Churchill called "The Iron Curtain."
The situation of Germany itself was also a tension spot. Germany was divided between the four Allied nations (Britain, France, the USA, and the USSR). The British, French and American sectors combined their governance of West Germany and West Berlin. This prompted the Soviets to blockade Berlin (located within the Soviet sector of East Germany). The American side responded with the Berlin Airlift to keep West Berlin free of Soviet control.
These were some of the events fueling tensions in the Cold War that was developing between the USA and its democratic allies and the USSR and its communist partners.
Answer:
because there ugly and they smell like fish thats been swimming in some doo doo
Explanation:
they need some frebreez up in that joint cause the be smelling like my grandma at bingo
"<span>b. The improvements in productivity in early agricultural societies enabled more complex societies to develop" would be the best option, since they had a surplus of food--meaning that people could focus on other jobs.</span>
Answer:
They ensured a huge free-state like California while giving the regions a chance to decide in favor of themselves.
They trusted the regions would cast a ballot to permit subjugation.
They trusted that if the regions cast a ballot to permit subjugation they would hold an enormous populace and various states the regions made up more land than California.
Answer: Brutus is more naive, while Cassius is manipulative and deceitful.
Explanation:
Shakespeare's <em>Julius Caesar </em>portrays the moral dilemma of Brutus, Caesar's friend. He makes a decision to participate in a conspiracy to murder Caesar, led by Cassius.
Cassius and Brutus differ in that Cassius is cunning and corrupt, while Brutus is naive. Although both of them plot to kill Caesar, Cassius turns out to be more treacherous than Brutus. Brutus first hesitates to join the plot, but eventually joins because of his naivety. Cassius is, on the other hand, the one who initiates the murder plot, and is a quite manipulative character.
