Answer:
Bias because it is an opinion
Hmm, I don't have a paragragh to read, could you please send it to me?
<span>The most probable answer to this problem would be all literary theories that has existed since then are still acceptable to use in literary analysis. The thing is, the utilization of these theories for literary analysis are close to little to none. Literary theories, literally, bloomed in usage from 1960s through 1980s to the point that the practitioners and the people related to this made actions to the extent of including it to the academies' curricula. As of the modern times, it declined until it died out. This doesn't mean that the usage is prohibited anymore, it is just that its popularity has died out since then.</span>
Answer:
B. The weather was frigid in Minnesota; it wasn't warm at all.
Explanation:
An antonym is the opposite word or meaning of a given word. It gives the exact opposite or different meaning of what is implied by a word.
In the context of the word "frigid", the antonym will be "warm, hot, pleasant," etc. And among the given statements, sentence B uses the antonym context of the word "frigid". While the other three statements give the implication of the coldness of Minnesota, the second sentence uses the antonym "warm" to add a different aspect of the coldness of the place.
Thus, the correct answer is option B.
