1. We can infer from the details of the passage that true or romantic love is more complex than lust because: it's more complex because we have no control over it and it is permanent.
2. The inferences that one can make about the types of subjects she has studied in addition to psychology is that she has studied "Philosophy".
<h3>What is inference?</h3>
Inference refers to the conclusion that one arrives as a result of observation and evaluation. Inference tends to be the final conclusion of an experimentation.
Sentence Frames:
1. In paragraph 2, the physicist Jim Al-Khalili states that lust is "is a
temporary passionate s**ual desire" and that it increases the release of a few chemicals in the body. On the other hand, true love "love is a powerful neurological condition like hunger or thirst, only more permanent" and is a condition he describes as "<u>permanent</u>" which shows that true love is more complex than lust.
In paragraph 3, the psychotherapist Philippa Perry refers to "love". In paragraph 4, she mentions "Aristotle" and lists "the philosophical saying of Aristotle".
Therefore, I can infer that Perry has studied "Philosophy".
3. In paragraph 7, the romantic novelist Jojo Moyes explains that love can be like "an obsession" and be "all consuming" so I can infer she is likely to include characters who were obsessed by love. Moyes also says that what "fascinates" her is "what separates love." Therefore, I can infer the plots of her books probably contain the incidences that led to separation of love.
Learn more about types of love on brainly.com/question/21491281
#SPJ1
A good one is In A Wind Storm in the Forests, John Muir uses descriptive language to
bring out the full beauty of the winds. He does this by appealing to the
senses. Particularly, sight and sound are emphasized in this passage.
He attempts to make the readers truly appreciate the subtle miracles
present when the winds are at play.
Its A. realism hope that helped :0 i looked it up btw
