Answer:
Reefs also serve as valuable sources of seafood and bring in tourist dollars. In Hawaii, the goods and services provided by coral reefs generate about $385 million in business each year.
Explanation:
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's article "Climate change in Hawaii and U.S. tropical islands" reports how the increasing climate temperature affects the overall natural world, especially reporting on the tropical islands and Hawaii. This report argues that the increasing climate will bring not only a change in the coastal and oceanic worlds but also affect the everyday lives of the humans living around it.
The article reports how reefs provide seafood and also promotes tourism, thereby bringing lots of financial profit for the places. Providing the statistics on how much income it generated through tourism, the report claims <em>"...coral reefs generate about $385 million in business each year"</em>. So, if the reefs are destroyed, then this source of income will also be affected. This supports the idea that dying reefs will change how people live their daily lives.
Thus, the correct answer is the fourth/ last option.
Cause it may not have been cool are big enough <span />
The part of speech which relate to NCOs is noun. It is the main subject about which the sentence talks about.
Given the sentence:
The only NCOs who are authorized to carry a sword are Marine NCOS.
There are eight parts of speech in English grammar, which are:
- noun,
- pronoun,
- verb,
- adjective,
- adverb,
- preposition,
- conjunction, and
- interjection.
In the given sentence, NCOs is the noun and 'to carry' is the verb.
Learn more about Parts of Speech on brainly.com/question/786588
#SPJ10
I think you should use for example, because that second sentence is an example of the first. Hope this helps.
Answer and explanation:
Note: I'm writing according to my responses while I read the story. Feel free to change anything to make it true for yourself.
Unlike readers at the time when the story was published, I've found it amusing and intelligent. At first, I assumed Mrs. Mallard would be another simple, shallow, tragic character. Her reaction after hearing of her husband's presumed death seemed quite normal, since she looked devastated. For an instant I thought she would die from her heart condition even though her sister and friend were careful while giving her the news. However, to my delight and surprise, Mrs. Mallard finds enlightenment at that sad moment. Her house and her husband have meant confinement for her. She has been obedient, submissive, impotent her whole life. As she locked her bedroom door, I thought she wouldn't know what to do without Mr. Mallard. But she looked out the window, saw the beautiful world that did not stop existing due to her husband's death, and realized she was finally free. The story suddenly got a thousand times more interesting. This woman, this seemingly shallow character, is actually deep and colorful. She has a will to live that had been buried. Now that the main symbol of her oppression as a woman is gone, she is at liberty to feel, think, and do as she pleases. It was comically tragic when she indeed died of her heart condition upon finding out her husband was alive. I hoped the story would end with Mrs. Mallard leaving the house and heading towards her new life. Still, the irony of the situation is amusing. Other characters assumed she died of happiness when we, the readers, know she died of disappointment.
