Gonzales v. CARHART explained please

History

1 answer:

Klio2033 [76]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Gonzales v. Carhart, was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court that upheld the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. The case reached the high court after U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales appealed a ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in favor of LeRoy Carhart that struck down the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act. Also before the Supreme Court was the consolidated appeal of Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which had struck down the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Which branch of govt does the president lead

Tju [1.3M]

The Executive Branch of Government

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following completes the graphic organizer below

g100num [7]

Answer:G

Explanation:

The king would rule as the one divine power till the magna carta was created. charging crimes against the king. Giving him less power

8 0

3 years ago

Which of the following was the most significant effect of the Laws of Burgos on the indigenous populations of the Americas under

MakcuM [25]

Answer:

B. The use of indigenous populations as part of a system of forced labor

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

16. What keeps the climate of Europe warmer than that of Canada?

Anastaziya [24]

Answer:

Explanation:

Europe gets warm wind from the south, and the wind it warm because the wind comes from the equator which gets more sunshine.

4 0

2 years ago

Do you think that government representatives truly represent the people or are they more interested in taking care of themselves

Gemiola [76]

<span>It's truly dependent upon the area represented. Smaller-level governance is definitely focused on the individual and small group, since the representative is directly responsible and able to communicate openly with their constituents. When the levels reach state and federal representatives, it becomes tougher to directly communicate because of the greater distance (and more levels) between the representative and the constituent.</span>

3 0

3 years ago