1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sloan [31]
2 years ago
11

How did Great Britain take advantage of the conflict between the Mughal and Maratha empires?

History
1 answer:
likoan [24]2 years ago
3 0

Great Britain took advantage of the conflict between the Mughal and the Maratha empires by exploiting them.

<h3>Why there was conflict between the Mughal and Maratha empires.</h3>

This conflict was due to territorial and religious strife. Both sides wanted to dominate the other side.

Both of the empires had large armies of men that was used to fight in the war against the other side.

The Marathas defeated the Mughals.

The British people took advantage of the war between the two sides to take over the Mughal empire which had already being weakened.

Also the Marathas did not have any form of capable leadership this gave the British the advantage over them.

Read more on the Mughal and Maratha empires here:

brainly.com/question/26118130?referrer=searchResults

You might be interested in
Why was population in western cities increasing ??
xxTIMURxx [149]
I believe it was because both blacks and whites were moving west to the cities to find jobs.

hope i helped :)
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which battles took place in spain, from 1571-1588
uranmaximum [27]
I don't know all of them but the battle of Lepanto took place in 1571.
5 0
3 years ago
-No clear separation of governmental powers
n200080 [17]

Answer:

Constitutional monarchy.

Explanation:

A Constitutional monarchy is a form of government in which monarch– King or Queen, shares power with the Consitutionalized form of government. In such form of government, the King or Queen act as a head of the state, whereas the the Prime Minister act as a head of the government.

The powers of monarchs in the Constitutional monarchy is either limited or ceremonial. Whereas the powers vested to the Prime Minister are excersied accordingly. The examples of such form of government includes UK, Australia, and Belgium.

Therefore, the Constitutional monarchy is the correct answer.

5 0
3 years ago
Freedom of religion means
devlian [24]

The first one freedom means what you want. So practice the religion you want your choice

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of these was a border state in the 1800's?
Goshia [24]
I think Maine not sure tho
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which statement best describes an advantage of direct democracy over indirect democracy? A. It can make decision making more eff
    7·2 answers
  • What features of politics in ancient Athens would be familiar to Americans today?
    15·1 answer
  • 6.what was the name of the set of principles that dominated economic thought in the seventeenth century?
    10·1 answer
  • The Battle of Gettysburg was a major turning point of the Civil War. Which was a major event of the battle?
    10·1 answer
  • What does the clip suggest about Hitler's character?
    9·1 answer
  • What does Attorney General Meese say about the words used by the people who framed the Constitution? What does Meese say will ha
    5·1 answer
  • Why do you think Reagan was able to survive his scandal
    14·1 answer
  • For President Wilson, the most important of the Fourteen Points was the one calling for
    14·2 answers
  • Hi.... what is mesopatamia's S.P.R.I.T.E?
    10·1 answer
  • Which two sentences best express how "A Poison Tree" transforms the story referred to in the previous question?A) Similar to the
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!