Answer:
high-context; low-context
Explanation:
Audience members who place more importance on nonverbal than verbal messages from a speaker might be from high-context cultures.
People from high-context cultures have highly collectivistic beliefs. Here mutual respect and businesses are done by building up relationships with each other and maintains respectful communication. People from High context cultures belief in interpersonal relationships. They give more importance to non verbal communications in the form of body language and gestures, behaviors and character.
Whereas those placing more emphasis on what was said than the nonverbal messages might be from low-context cultures.
In low context cultures, a lot of information is exchange through direct talks and communication. People from low context cultures follow direct rules and maintains standards. They are task oriented and have short term relationship.
Thus the answer is "high-context" and "low-context".
Answer:
President Andrew Jackson responded by signing the Force Bill and the Compromise Tariff Bill in 1833.
Explanation:
The president issued a Proclamation to the People of South Carolina stating the supremacy of the federal government. The force bill was signed by the congress on March 1, 1833 stating the use of the military to enforce tariff if necessary. South Carolina had threatened to secede if tariffs we're enforced. They backed down when they couldn't get other southern states to support them.
He declared resistance to British salt policies to be the unifying theme for his new campaign of satyagraha, or mass civil disobedience.
Answer:
Correct answer is In the East China Sea is an island country known as Taiwan. Its capital is Taipei. It is a Chinese speaking country.
Explanation:
It is a rather small country, with a large population of more than 23 million inhabitants. Political status of the country is very peculiar as China considers Taiwan part of its own territory. Taiwan is also known as economical giant, having developed in last couple of decades.
Answer:
Answered below
Explanation:
Examples of leaders who act differently to what they say are corrupt police officers. Police officers are leaders in the enforcement and abidance to the law. When a corrupt police officer goes against the law in letting criminals go free or in arresting innocent people, then their credibility is destroyed. This creates a lack of confidence in the ability of such a leader to be an effective leader.
A corrupt police officer who goes against the law takes away my trust in him and makes me see him as unreliable and unprofessional.
Such leaders would find it difficult to regain the trust their followers had in them because they have proved themselves unreliable and ineffective in their service to their followers.
