Answer:
Rhetorical listening offers the 'stance of openness to subsume different perspectives.'
Explanation:
The key difference between the regular and rhetorical listening is that the latter gives us enough broadness to pay attention to opposing views as well. It helps us in moving ahead of our various cultural or other identity-associated barriers and view different frameworks or perspectives. Rhetorical listening takes us to a more ethical and logical while believing in anyone's thoughts or opinions during an argument. Rhetorical listening promotes comprehension and collective knowledge.
Answer:
a. We praised Suman, whose performance was remarkable.
b. The boys that came late were punished.
c. The businessman who I saw last night was very rich.
d. The man whom I trusted betrayed me.
e. Give me the book that is on the table.
Explanation:
Let me add the disclaimer that I'm not a native English speaker, but I want to help. :)
There are essential and nonessential clauses: they're differentiated by commas, like in this example: "<em>Carrots and brussel sprouts, which are often discarded, happen to provide many nutrients". </em>This is an example of a nonessential clause since it utilizes a comma to deliver more information.
Here are a few more examples you can use to compare the answers/future questions with:
<em>"The man who forgot his wallet is coming back to retrieve it."</em>
<em>"Katie, who has the same class as Henry, is my best friend."</em>
<em>"I like dogs that have sleek fur."</em>
<em />
Really hoped this was useful!
Answer:
C
Explanation:
C because it shows how the wetlands are decreasing, and plus it adds more evidence to the speech.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
The authors only writes that if people help out more, the issue will go away. It gives no support and doesn't go into further details about how or why this supposed help will fix our problems.
Because the seating shows the time and place and you can see where the character lives and the time that is the story taking place
