Answer:
because it rewrote federal law over the objections of Congress,
Explanation:
Seven states, including Texas, sued the federal government in May 2018 arguing that DACA was unconstitutional because <u>it rewrote federal law over the objections of Congress</u>.
Answer:
1) Revising helps make your writing clearer
2) The final draft has been revised and proofread
3) Proofreading allows you to find and fix errors in spelling and grammar.
4) Prewriting
Explanation:
1) Revising allows you to take away unwanted errors or sentences and clears it up
2) The final draft is being shared so the writer revises and proofreads for quality work.
3) Proofreading is when you go through your paper and make sure every sentence is 100% perfect
4) Prewriting can help you get all your ideas on to one paper, until your ready to start your rough draft.
The old world monkey that became s<span>pecial interest to paleoanthropologists because it lives in savannahs like those in which we expect ancestral humans may have lived is: </span><span>baboons
the </span>paleoanthropologists paid a lot of interest to this animal because their behavior and decision-making process is very close to human.
For example, in their baboons' group, there will be some type of leaders that lead through tyranny and some leaders that lead through cooperation and understanding. (just like humans)
On top of that, many of the baboon leaders that led with tyranny often betrayed by its subordinate and killed while sleeping (again, just like human)
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Can an institution of higher learning use race as a factor when making admissions decisions?
Result: The Court held that universities may use race as part of an admissions process so long as "fixed quotas" are not used. The Court determined that the specific system in place at the University of California Medical School was "unnecessary" to achieve the goal of creating a diverse student body and was merely a "fixed quota" and therefore, was unconstitutional.
Importance: The decision started a line of cases in which the Court upheld affirmative action programs. In 2003, such academic affirmative action programs were again directly challenged in Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. In these cases, the Court clarified that admission programs that include race as a factor can pass constitutional muster so long as the policy is narrowly tailored and does not create an automatic preference based on race. The Court asserted that a system that created an automatic race-based preference would in fact violate the Equal Protection Clause.
Because there is no science that supports the claim that there are <span>special sunglasses that allow differing amounts of light to the left or right eye and thereby helping to treat mood disorders</span><span>, these special sunglasses demonstrate the principle of </span>extraordinary claims. Extraordinary evidence is required in order this statement to be true and proofed.
