1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
melomori [17]
2 years ago
14

Which factor caused many European countries to become involved in World War I?

History
1 answer:
malfutka [58]2 years ago
5 0

Answer: Imperialism

Explanation: European expansion into the western world was the biggest factor in them becoming involved into world war I.

You might be interested in
Why did native Americans and French have to deal with each other on equal terms
bulgar [2K]

The main reason is that they did not try to change the Natives. They also did not compete with the Natives for land. When the French first came to the Americas in the 1530s and 1540s to engage in seasonal fur trading, they immediately established strong trading ties with the local Natives they found there. The Natives already dealt extensively in furs.

The French quickly discovered they could go back to France in the winter months with ships laden with furs they had purchased from the Natives with European wares, such as metal cooking pots, weapons, horses, and other goods not accessible to the Natives at that time. The Natives also accompanied the French on hunting parties and showed them where the good fur animals could be found. The French made it a point to learn the Native languages and ways, and established good relations that were based on equality with all of the tribes in the area.

The French began to stay year-round in the early 1600s, establishing their first permanent settlement at Quebec in 1608, one year after the English founded Jamestown in Virginia. They did not displace any Natives in the establishment of their settlement and continued to work closely with them in the fur trade. They respected Native territories, their ways, and treated them as the human beings they were. The Natives, in turn, treated the French as trusted friends. More intermarriages took place between French settlers and Native Americans than with any other European group.

This close alliance, which was based on mutual respect and good treatment from both sides, led the Natives to side with the French in their conflicts with the English settlers that came later in the 1600s and into the mid-1700s. Relations between the Natives and the English were not nearly as good.

The English treated the Natives as inferior, believed they stood in the way of their God-given right to the land in America and tried to subject the Natives to their laws as they established their colonies. The Spanish didn’t have any better relations with the Natives, as they tried to enslave them when they first came to America, and later established missions where they tried to force them to convert from their traditional religions to Catholicism. The Natives did not appreciate any of this.

The key to the friendly relations the French enjoyed with the Natives was all in the way they treated them when they first encountered them, and how they continued to treat them afterward. As long as the French maintained settlements in America, they enjoyed excellent relations with each other. For those who have early American French ancestry, or French settler ancestors who married Native Americans, the vast majority of those records can be found in the provincial archives of Quebec (some records there might lead back to France if the settler returned there with his Native American bride).

These records provide a fascinating look at relations between Natives and Europeans and show just how different things could have been if all the European people who came to America had been as progressive in their treatment of the Natives as the French were.

7 0
3 years ago
If you had been in president trumans position would you have approved the use of the atomic weapon against Japan
bogdanovich [222]
This isn’t something I can answer. It’s personal choice, if it were me tho. I would say “I would, Only because if we didn’t do it everyone would think it’s okay to bomb us”
8 0
3 years ago
What was unique about the Napoleonic code, and what was its long-term impact on France and Europe?
Grace [21]
<span>The original Napoleonic Code, or Code Napoléon (originally called the Code civil des francais, or civil code of the French), was the French civil code, established at the behest of Napoléon. It entered into force on March 21, 1804. The Napoleonic code was the first legal code to be established in a country with a civil legal system. It was based on Roman law, and followed Justinian's Corpus Juris Civilis in dividing civil law into: 1.personal status; 2.property; 3.acquisition of property. The Napoleonic Code properly said dealt only with civil law issues; other codes were also published dealing with criminal law and commercial law. Even though the Napoleonic Code was not the first, it was the most influential one. (For a list of early codes, see here). It was adopted in many countries that were occupied by French forces during the Napoleonic Wars and thus formed the basis of the private law systems also of Italy, the Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, Portugal and their former colonies. Other codes with some influence in their own right were the Swiss, German and Austrian ones, but even there some influence of the French code can be felt, as the Napoleonic Code is considered the first sucessful codification. Thus, the civil law systems of the countries of modern Europe, with the exception of the United Kingdom, Ireland, Russia, and the Scandinavian countries have, to different degrees, been influenced by the Napoleonic Code. The Code has thus been the most permanent legacy of Napoleon. </span>
3 0
3 years ago
In what ways did the election of 1828 and the presidency of andrew jackson influence the modern view of the presidency?
ivann1987 [24]
Andrew Jackson came from a very poor and uneducated family.  His election as president showed that the "common man" could become president.
3 0
4 years ago
Why was the new king of Egypt afraid of the israelites?
Darina [25.2K]
In a third attempt to weaken the Israelites and resolve Pharaoh's irrational fear, the Egyptian king commands all his people (not just the Hebrew midwives) to kill all Hebrew baby boys by throwing them into the Nile River.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Does the song, “Ballad of the Green Berets” support the Vietnam war?
    15·1 answer
  • Both Julius Caesar and Augustus used what tool as a means to bolster public support and opinion of the Roman leadership?
    12·1 answer
  • The 1998 tobacco industry settlement in the united states prohibited ______.
    5·1 answer
  • "Theodore c. Sorensen's memorandum, October 18, 1962." List the possible courses of action, including some advantages and disadv
    14·1 answer
  • How was the British army able to regain control of Georgia During the American Revolution
    8·1 answer
  • Montaigne believes that teachers should a. listen to their students. b. tell their students what to do. c. make students memoriz
    10·2 answers
  • How was Richard Nixon involved in the cold war?
    7·1 answer
  • What is the capital of west virginia
    10·1 answer
  • How did populists appeal to organized labor?
    14·1 answer
  • How and why did the USA win World War 2
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!