Answer:
Yes, the spin off was successful.
With the major segments of fast food being sandwich chains, pizza chains, family restaurants, dinner houses, chicken chains, and more each Yum restaurant needed to be placed into their own niche. They also started using multi-branding and putting the brands in the same building. This allowed one location to draw in a more diverse crowd of consumers while offering them more variety and covering the other brands weak points.
Reason for their success.
PepsiCo, when spinning off these fast food chains, openly stated “restaurants weren't our schtick.” I.e the company presented themselves themselves to media that restaurants isn't focus. Before the spin off KFC, Pizza Hut, and Taco Bell often acted as their own entities and competed with each other resulting in lowered sales for all of the restaurants. With the spin off of Tricon the restaurants were unified with the sharing of many resources and using their collective clout, as one of the top five brands, to get better deals on ingredients all the restaurants share. Their concentrated focus allows them to be greatly effective in entering new markets such as Asia
The answer is variety within unity. It is because this is
the principle being described above in which has became a premise of the
humorous photograph of Elliot Erwitt towards Felix, Gladys and Rover. It is a
principle that changes the character of a certain element.
Answer:
the size of M1 can only be a fraction of checkable deposits.
Explanation:
fractional reserve banking system requires that a fraction banks receive as deposits from customers be kept as reserves with the central bank and the rest be made out as loans.
M1 consists of coins, demand deposits and currency in circulation. Banks determine the money in circulation by giving out loans. so the size of M1 can only be a fraction of checkable deposits.
Answer: Option (D) is correct.
Explanation:
Correct: The country’s production possibilities curve will shift out.
The production possibility frontier shows different combination of two goods that are to be produced with the available resources. It also shows the point on the curve which represents the efficient level of quantity to be produced.
So, if there is any improvement in the factors such as technology advancement and level of education will generally results in higher economic growth and increase in the level of output.
Hence, there is an outward shift in the production possibility frontier.
Answer:
$2,880
Explanation:
Given that,
Total machine-hours = 30,300
Total fixed manufacturing overhead cost = $ 575,700
Variable manufacturing overhead per machine-hour = $ 4.00
For Job T687:
Number of units in the job = 10
Total machine-hours = 30
Direct materials = $730
Direct labor cost = $1,460
Total variable overhead estimated:
= Variable manufacturing overhead per machine-hour × Total machine-hours
= $4 × 30,300
= $121,200
Total overhead estimated:
= Total variable overhead estimated + Total fixed overhead estimated
= $121,200 + $575,700
= $696,900
Predetermined overhead rate:
= Total overhead estimated ÷ Total machine-hours
= $696,900 ÷ 30,300
= $23 per machine hour
Total overhead applied:
= predetermined overhead rate × Total machine hours for Job T687
= $23 × 30
= $690
Total job cost:
= Direct material + Direct labor + Total overhead
= $730 + $1,460 + $690
= $2,880
