Francesco Guicciardini attitude to deal with tyrants is to have a healthy relationship for the benefit of its people and himself.
- Being close to tyrants, he can gain trust and help in forestall plans.
- The colonial leaders tried to maintain a good relationship with the British.
- After the revolution, treaties sign to maintain peaceful relations with the two countries.
- Guicciardini would've made a great patriot because he believes that deception and success are useful. The more you enjoy the reputation of an honest and truthful, others will easily believe.
Therefore, we can conclude that Guicciardini's attitude to deal with the tyrants, justified.
Learn more about "Guicciardini" here:
brainly.com/question/21572232
The answer should be the <span>Glorious Revolution. This revolution is also known as the </span>Bloodless Revolution. Not a single ounce of blood was shed.
Hope this Helps! :)
Answer:
Two things that helped spark the revolution were the salons and the location of Mexico. These salons were important because they gave the people a place to talk and discuss ideas. At the salons, during the Peninsular War, people began to discuss enlightenment ideas and independence. These discussions would allow for the revolution to take root with the common people, in turn leading to the support of the revolution by thousands of Mexicans. Because of Mexico’s close proximity to the United States, these enlightenment ideas were able to flow easily between the two countries. Also, the Mexican people were able to see the success of the American Revolution up close, in turn leading them to talks of independence for their own county. Thus, it is clear that the geographic proximity of Mexico to the United States and the salons played a key role in sparking the revolution.
Porfirio Diaz was president of Mexico from 1884 to 1911, This was a time of great economic growth for Mexico, as the regime opened its doors to foreign investment, particularly in the mining sector. However, Diaz's policies promoted a strong centralized government, which would lead to an unequal focus on certain regions and economic activities of the country, leaving others exposed to impoverishment. The expropriation of peasants lands in favor of big enterprises enraged rural populations. Inequality among the regions and societies of urbanized areas was becoming more evident. This led to a series of manifestations against the government that would eventually lead to the end of the regime.
