Answer:
Explanation:
X - number of units sold
Total cost for production = 1,500,000 + 1600X
Total cost for purchasing = 2000X
a. For 4000 units sold
Total cost for production = 1,500,000 + 1600 * 4000 = $7,900,000
Total cost for purchasing = 2000* 4000 = $8,000,000
In this case producing is cheaper. Therefore, it is better to produce
b. Y - break-even point
Then : 1,500,000 + 1600 * Y = 2000* Y
So 1,500,000 = 400 Y
Y = 3750
At №of units less than 3750 purchasing will be the better option
And above 3750 producing will be the better option
Commuting - Traveling to get to work
Telecommutting - A form of flexplace...
Flextime - Flexibility in when you work
Flexplace - Flexibility in where you work
They use The Economic Analysis Method to assign an monetary value, because it is often difficult to assign a value. This approach ( The Economic Analysis Method) states that, the patents value is the replacement cost, or at least the right amount to replace the protection right on the invention.
I hope this answered your question! :^)
Answer:
a. NAV = 8 per share
b. 250.000 shares
c. 7.95
Explanation:
a. NAV = Market value of shares/number of shares = $8m/1m = $8 per share
b. At the current NAV, it can absorb up to $2 million, or 250,000 shares.
c-1. Its loss by selling 25,000 shares of IBM at $34 instead of $36 = -$2 x 25,000 = -$50,000.
New NAV = $7,950,000 /1m = $7.95
Answer:
a. $0
Explanation:
The business would not be subject to taxation in a state until nexus is established; thus the Chipper’s Apportionable income <u><em>(which means income of any class or type or any activity, that fulfils the connection or criteria described either in the "functional test" or "transactional test,”.)</em></u> that is taxed by X equals $0
