Answer:
False
Explanation:
"Cash-to-cash Analysis and Management" by<em> Hutchinson, Farris and Anders</em> talks about the availability of the<em> financial data</em> and <em>computer technology</em> in assisting a business when it comes to determining its <u>cash-to-cash position </u><em><u>(C2C)</u></em><em>,</em> as well as the <em>benchmarks</em> needed for comparison.
Cash-to-cash analysis was difficult in the past, however, it is easier nowadays. The supply chain is even examined at a broader view than before. C2C efficiency is possible by utilizing the<em> readily available</em> financial date and computer technology. So, this makes the statement above as "false."
So, this explains the answer.
Answer:
$4,650,000,000
Explanation:
We will use the formula below to calculate the enterprise value of Correct inc.
Enterprise value = Market value capital and debts - Cash and investments
= 100 million diluted shares × 37.50 per share + $1 billion of debt outstanding - $100 million cash
= $3750m + $1000m - $100m
= $4,650,000,000.
You get kind of a credit every time you buy something from the card issuer. that means you borrow money for the purchase you make from the card issuer with the promise to pay them at the end of the month (or whenever your contract tells you to). it's easy to switch credit cards and there are a lot of free contracts out there. better give your credit card number to someone you don't trust than your bank account number. cause in case of a fraud you can just change credit card. changing the bank account is a lot harder than changing credit card (plus the card issuer has the problem of not getting their money. not you)
M1 money growth in the US was about 16% in 2008, 7% in 2009 and 9% in 2010. Over the same time period, the yield on 3-month Treasury bills fell from almost 3% to close to 0%. Given these high rates of money growth, why did interest rates fall, rather than increase? What does this say about the income, price level and expected-inflation effects?
Higher money growth (increase in the money supply) should have the following effects:
Liquidity effect indicates that this growth in money should shift money supply to the right, which should decrease the interest rate.
Income effect indicates that the growth in money should increase income levels, which should increase the demand for money and shift the demand curve to the right. This should increase the interest rate.
The price level effect indicates that the growth in money should increase price levels, which should increase the demand for money and shift the demand curve to the right. This should also increase the interest rate.
During this time period, unemployment was high, economic growth was weak and policymakers were more concerned with deflation than they were with inflation.
Therefore, the expected inflation effect was almost non-existent (due to the concerns with deflation) and the liquidity effect dominated all other effects, which made interest rates fall.
<span>This is illustrated with the first graph on slide 32 of the Theory of Money Powerpoints.</span>
Answer:
It is 6.58%
Explanation:
Debt-Equity Ratio = Debt/Equity
0.68= Debt/358,200
Debt = 0.68 x 358,200
Debt = $243,576
Total Asset Turnover = Revenue/ Total Asset
Total Assets = Debt + Equity = $243,576+ $358,200=$601,776
1.2= Revenue/601,776
Revenue= 1.2 x 601,776
=$722,131.20
Profit Margin = Net income/ Revenue x 100%
= $47,500/$722,131.20 x100%
= 6.58%
