Territorial expansion remained popular with the U.S. public, as did the idea of spreading republican government. Many pro-slavery Southerners sought to expand southwards, allowing for more territory where slavery could continue to grow and expand.
Human Sacrifices is the act of killing one or more humans, usually as an offering to a deity, as part of a ritual. Human sacrifice has been practiced in various cultures throughout history.
I mean.
They're both in history and ''practiced''.
Though a connection, no, Territorial expansion went along with slavery. The act of killing another human being is not very humane nor a connection. Slavery deals with principles of property law are applied to them, allowing individuals to own, buy and sell other individuals, as a de jure form of property. A slave is unable to withdraw unilaterally from such an arrangement and works without remuneration. Human Sacrifices deal with people who have really no choice and are dead either way, victims were typically ritually killed in a manner that was supposed to please or appease gods, spirits or the deceased. Slavery doesn't deal with death. So, no.
I believe the answer is: Collective perspective
Collective perspective tend to make people stray away from individualism.
This would diminish people's drive to compete and beat other people who strive for a same goal. As a result, people with collective perspective tend to be less likely to obtain high positions and salaries.
Answer:
A. gold B. diamond are natural resources .
beacuse for coffee and Cron we have to grow them .
Answer:
Aileen must form an explanation if she hasn't already done the hypothesis,
