1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
allochka39001 [22]
2 years ago
5

Should the US have joined the League of Nations? Why or why not?

History
2 answers:
Olin [163]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The United States should absolutely join sign the Treaty of Versailles and join the League of Nations. The United States fought in World War 1 and many Americans lost their lives defeating the Germans and their allies. ... It is only right that America should do everything it can to help prevent another major war.Explanation:

sukhopar [10]2 years ago
3 0
No because the us is the us and that’s why
You might be interested in
Write<br> Paragraph<br> Comparing<br> Feudalism &amp;<br> Democracy
Molodets [167]
Feudalism is a system run by multiple nobles who look over provinces they rule under the kings authority. Democracy is a system in which government officials are elected by the people, or a group to run the nation until reelection or death.
3 0
3 years ago
The house of representatives has the special power to​
shtirl [24]

"initiate revenue bills, impeach federal officials, and elect the President in the case of an electoral college tie" - I quote from Hal Rogers

Hope this helps, if not, comment below please!!!!

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who had the most successful Anglo-American colony in Texas?
Bess [88]

Answer:

Austin

Explanation:

Austin, because the most successful Texas empresario, made four six-year contracts between 1823 and 1828 for a potential 1,200 families

8 0
4 years ago
Compare and contrast the views of the religious modernists and fundamentalists. How did Darwinism and the Scopes trial symbolize
Zina [86]

The religious modernists were a group of theologians and clergy who embraced modernity and aimed to reconcile science and religion. They believed that God was still active in the world and that religious truth could be discovered through reason and science. The fundamentalists, on the other hand, were a group of conservative Christians who reacted against modernity. They believed that the Bible was the literal word of God and that science was incompatible with Christianity.

The Scopes trial was a symbol of the conflict between the two groups. The trial was held to determine whether a high school teacher, John Scopes, had violated a Tennessee law by teaching evolution. The modernists supported Scopes, while the fundamentalists opposed him. The trial was a victory for the fundamentalists, but it ultimately helped to publicize the modernists' views and to promote religious tolerance.

7 0
1 year ago
How did the world get here?
madreJ [45]
The world was created by God. He spoke and the world came into existence.  
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 3,4,5,6 pls. The note are in the comment
    11·1 answer
  • ~BRAINLIEST!!~
    15·2 answers
  • In the tale of Osiris, Isis, and Horus, Re curses Nut and her ability to bear children when he learns she has slept with Geb and
    6·1 answer
  • According to the colonist which act taxed colonist without their permission
    13·1 answer
  • How did coffee play a pivotal role in the scientific revolution
    11·2 answers
  • What did the letters X, Y, and Z refer to in the dispatches sent from the American commissioners attempting to negotiate with Ta
    10·1 answer
  • In what way was the Quaker view of women unusual in the 1600s?
    5·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP THIS IS DUE IN AN HOUR!!!
    6·1 answer
  • Bleeding Kansas occurred when people tried to flood into Kansas upon hearing that popular sovereignty would determine if it woul
    7·1 answer
  • 2) What did the British and French do to protect their claims?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!