Actions speak louder than words means talking about something isn't going to make it better, you should take action so it helps solve the problem. I wouldn't say it talks about proving anything wrong based on the definition.
The three types of appeals:
-Pathos: appeal to emotions: make the children imagine someone can read their thoughts and knows their last embarrassing memory; then compare it to the personal information that can be leaked
-Ethos: appeal to the general argument that everyone should have the right to decide who knows what about whom
-Logos: appeal to logic: tell the that if their personal information is leaked, it can be used by other people, if if it's not leaked, it won't be used by other people
Han applies option c- he is challenging the credibility of sources. Ramona ,surprised, asks him if the evidence from Pettit's book was from fictional sources. Hans supports his claim through a review of Giovanni Fiorini's book. The material from this book which had been written by a story-teller and not by a historian was used by Pettit.
Option a- is wrong. Hans is not determining new research goals. He is questioning the credibility of sources.
Option b-is wrong. Hans is evaluating what an author said about Giovanni Fiorini's book. The material from this 'great' source was used by Pettit in <em>his </em>book.
Option d is wrong. Ramona is asking clarifying questions. She wants Hans to justify his claim. This states that the credibility of sources can be questioned.
Information is grouped together by the subject of each amendment <span />
