Answer: The correct answer is "Material losses resulting from correction of errors related to prior periods.".
Explanation: It is generally established that the type of loss that is excluded from the determination of net income in the income statement are the material losses resulting from transactions in the company's investments account.
Answer:
<em>B. demand for Apple computers decreases.</em>
Explanation:
If two things are substitute of each and other, that generally in simple words means either this or this. As we can see in the statements that has been provided in the question that Dell and Apple computers are substitute of each other, <em>so if the amount from Dell computer decreases then the demand of the computers made by Apple company will absolutely decrease. </em>
Because two devices which carries almost same qualities and features are also substitute of each other, i<em>f price of one device from the both substitutes will decrease, everyone will rush to buy the device with low price and the device with high price will get less popular among the consumers.</em> So, this is the reason which says OPTION(B) is the correct answer.
Answer:
Yes, Dealer could collect damages from GM because basically GM breached the contract. Any time a contract is breached, the non-breaching party can sue. But the real question here is what amount could the court assign to Dealer as compensation for damages incurred. If you want to rephrase this question, it would be: What damages did Dealer suffer due to GM's breach.
If the damages are not significant, then the court will probably assign some amount for nominal damages. To be honest, the greatest expenses here are actually the legal costs of the lawsuit. Unless Dealer can prove that assigning the contract actually hurt them (which I doubt), then the court will assign a small amount. Sometimes nominal damages can be very small and mostly symbolic, e.g. $1.
Money is any item that serves as a medium of exchange for goods and services.
<u>Answer:
</u>
The interest rate effect explains why the aggregate demand curve is downward sloping.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The interest rate effect proposed by Keynes suggests the reasons for why is the aggregate demand curve downward sloping.
- It states that, when the interest rates are low, people choose to invest owing to the decreased costs of investment. This investment stimulates a drop in the levels of price.
- The dropped prices thus increase the aggregate demand for the commodities of which the price has dropped.
