The answer to this question is II
Floor and committee consideration of the policy
Answer:
Back in the day when scientific discoveries had just begun, the elite started to see opportunities in the business world that could be made use of due to the advent of scientific discoveries.
In addition to the profitable version, the elite also started to see conflict between the religious view and the scientific ideas. This conflict created distance between the elite and the religion.
On the other other hand, the lower classes got closer to religion because for them, scientific discoveries were out of reached and they thought of them as devils.
Answer:
<em>The probability that more than 3.75 gallons are used for any wash cycle is 0.8944 or 89.44%</em>
Explanation:
<u>Normal Distribution</u>
Some probabilistic events are modeled by using the so-called bell curve or normal distribution 
where 
is the mean and 
is the standar deviation. The cummulative values for the normal distribution are usually given as 'left tail' of the sum of all values less than certain maximum value. In other words, the value of 
is given by tables or any digital means because the cannot be directly computed by formulas. We used the Excel's formula called NORM.DIST(x,mean,standard_dev,cumulative).
The study case of the question provides the following data
And we are required to compute 
. Since the Excel formula gives us the left-tail value, we use the negation of that value to find our desired probability, that is:
We now find the value of NORM.DIST(3.75,4,0.2,TRUE)=0.1056. Thus
Thus the probability that more than 3.75 gallons are used for any wash cycle is 0.8944 or 89.44%
Answer:
No
Explanation:
There is a famous theory by Kenneth Kitchen that has been used about this topic very widely, the theory itself is too hard to summarize with the limited character so I'll use a singular quote: The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence. In other words, just because you don't see it doesn't mean its not there and vice versa. This theory basically goes off of hope that something is there just because initial signs point to it. The reason its used in arguments like this is because it basically justifies someone doing something irrational as taking away someone's individual rights for suspicion's they have neither confirmed nor denied kind of like Schrodinger's cat. But this is told from the catcallers perspective and not the victim itself, not only have you taken away their rights because you thought something , you didn't even have to prove any of your accusations. In other words its the land of the free, and here we have a court of lie where a person or persons are liable to meet these accusations in a court of their peers for a fair trial before anyone's rights can be revoked, this isn't a 'partriot' act, its a fear act. And fear is the degrader of the mind , and the plague of society.
