Answer:
Both are the same but Texas Bill of Rights more protection.
Explanation:
The bill of rights in the United States constitution is similar to the bill of rights in the Texas constitution because both provides protection to the rights of human and freedom of speech, religion etc. The Texas Bill of Rights provides the same protections as the United States Bill of Rights but it also extends these rights beyond federal protections. For example, According to Sec. 3a clearly forbids discrimination based on sex, race, color, creed, or national origin.
<span>a. Southern congressmen opposed the banning of slavery from the new territories
</span><span>Northern states and southern states were at odds over the potential spread of slavery in new states and what that would do to the balance of power in Congress. <span>
In 1846, Congressman David Wilmot of Pennsylvania introduced the proviso as an amendment to an appropriations bill in connection with the peace treaty being negotiated with Mexico. His amendment stipulated that any territory gained from Mexico would be free, not allowing slavery. Wilmot's amendment passed in the House of Representatives, but was unable to get approval in the Senate. The Compromise of 1850, a package of five bills passed by Congress in September of that year, sought to accommodate some of the issues both South and North were debating over during those years. But we know that war over the slavery issue was yet to come.</span></span>
A developed nation is a country that: 1. Form of government (Democracy) 2. Free market economy 3. Lack of corruption 4. More dependent on manufacturing than on agriculture 5. Advanced/Abundant technology. A developing nation is a country that: 1.Has a low standard of living 2. Has an undeveloped industry 3. Lacks modern technology 4. Has low levels of education, healthcare, and life expectancy. A developed nation has reached the highest level of advancement for its people, life in these countries is really good. In a developing nation however, life is very difficult for its people. These nations have not reached the level of advancement developed nations reached.
Personally, I don't think so.
Every information we have is by principle, biased. We can never have a full picture on the issue (we don't live long enough to have ALL the information and all the other people's opinions) so this means that we only know a selection of relevant information. This selection biases our perception of the issue: so in this way, I think that we are bound to be at least a little bit biased.
